With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Federated Hermes, Inc. (NYSE:FHI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Federated Hermes, Inc. (NYSE:FHI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Federated Hermes' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 顯著的高比例機構持股意味着Federated Hermes的股票價格對他們的交易活動敏感
- 共有13名投資者在該公司擁有50%的控股權
- 內部人士最近出售了股票。
Every investor in Federated Hermes, Inc. (NYSE:FHI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
Federated Hermes, Inc.(紐交所:FHI)每位投資者都應了解最強大的股東集團。機構持有83%的股份,擁有公司最多的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構可以獲取大量資本,因此他們的市場動作往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,大量機構投資於一家公司的資金通常被視爲積極的特徵。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Federated Hermes.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Federated Hermes的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Federated Hermes?
機構持股告訴我們關於Federated Hermes的什麼信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
Federated Hermes already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Federated Hermes' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Federated Hermes已經在股東名冊上有機構投資者。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出不好的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看一下Federated Hermes的盈餘歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Federated Hermes. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. With 11% and 7.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and FMR LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.
機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以共同強有力地影響董事會的決定。 對沖基金在Federated Hermes的股份不多。 公司最大的股東是先鋒集團,持股11%。 貝萊德和FMR LLC分別是第二和第三大股東,各持有11%和7.3%的流通股。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到前13大股東控制着50%的股份,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構的所有權是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究也可以達到同樣的效果。有很多分析師在覆蓋該股票,因此查看他們的預期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Federated Hermes
Federated Hermes的內部股權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in Federated Hermes, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$142m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以看到內部人士擁有Federated Hermes, Inc.的股份。內部人士持有價值14200萬美元的重大股份。大多數人會將這個視爲一個真實的積極因素。大多數人會認爲這表明股東與董事會之間的利益一致。不過,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有在賣出股份。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,持有公司13%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。儘管這個 ownership 的規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,這可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Federated Hermes better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Federated Hermes that you should be aware of.
考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解Federated Hermes,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,我們已經識別出Federated Hermes有1個警告信號,你應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。