Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:HAYW) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%
Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:HAYW) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Hayward Holdings implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構在海沃德控股公司(Hayward Holdings)的大量持有表明他們對公司股票價格有顯著影響。
- 前12個股東持有51%的業務。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。
A look at the shareholders of Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:HAYW) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看海沃德控股公司(Hayward Holdings, Inc.)的股東(紐交所:HAYW)可以告訴我們哪個團體最有權力。而持有最大份額的團體是機構,擁有87%的股份。換句話說,該團體從其對公司的投資中最有可能獲得收益(或遭受損失)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
因爲機構股東擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策通常會受到重視,尤其是對於個人投資者。因此,投資於公司的大量機構資金通常代表着對其未來的巨大信心。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hayward Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討一下海沃德控股的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hayward Holdings?
機構股權告知我們海沃德控股什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hayward Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hayward Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在海沃德控股中擁有相當一部分股份。這在專業投資者中暗示了一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構在同一時間改變了對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看看海沃德控股的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是最重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hayward Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is FMR LLC, with ownership of 9.3%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.1% and 7.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
機構投資者持有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決策。我們注意到對海沃德控股的對沖基金沒有顯著投資。公司的最大股東是FMR LLC,擁有9.3%的股份。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有8.1%和7.3%的流通股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東註冊,我們可以看到前12大股東控制了51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有大多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構的所有權是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究也可以達到同樣的效果。有很多分析師在覆蓋該股票,因此查看他們的預期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Hayward Holdings
海沃德控股的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能具有主觀性,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終需要對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或CEO的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Hayward Holdings, Inc.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$18m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士持有海沃德控股公司少於1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士持有價值1800萬美元的股票。絕對值可能比比例股份更重要。可以說,近期的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有進行買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆普遍,尤其是零售投資者,持有公司12%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。儘管這部分持股可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Hayward Holdings .
我發現研究誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。不過,要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該注意到我們發現的與海沃德控股相關的一個警告信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。