Institutional Investors Control 57% of American Outdoor Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ:AOUT) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 45%
Institutional Investors Control 57% of American Outdoor Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ:AOUT) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 45%
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in American Outdoor Brands implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 52% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構在American Outdoor Brands的持有量意味着他們對公司股票價格有重要影響
- 52%的業務由前11大股東持有
- 所有權研究結合歷史數據可以幫助提供對股票機會的良好理解
Every investor in American Outdoor Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ:AOUT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 57% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每位American Outdoor Brands, Inc.(納斯達克:AOUT)的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有57%股份的機構。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Last week's 45% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 94% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週45%的漲幅意味着,儘管公司顯示出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一方。當前股東的一年回報率爲94%,而上週的漲幅更是錦上添花。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about American Outdoor Brands.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於American Outdoor Brands的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About American Outdoor Brands?
機構持股情況能告訴我們關於American Outdoor Brands的哪些信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
We can see that American Outdoor Brands does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see American Outdoor Brands' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,American Outdoor Brands確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師對該股票進行了評估,他們喜歡它。但和其他任何人一樣,他們也可能會犯錯。當多個機構共同持有一隻股票時,總會存在風險,即它們可能處於「擁擠的交易」中。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以看到下面American Outdoor Brands的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,事實總是更復雜。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 11% of American Outdoor Brands. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is Hallador Investment Advisors, Inc., with ownership of 8.7%. With 6.5% and 6.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP and Brandes Investment Partners, LP are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Brian Murphy directly holds 0.9% of the total shares outstanding.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此它們可以共同發揮重要的影響力。我們的數據顯示,對American Outdoor Brands的對沖基金持有11%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金的行爲通常比較活躍且具激進性。許多基金尋找中期催化劑,以推動股價上漲。公司的最大股東是Hallador Investment Advisors, Inc.,持有8.7%的股份。Dimensional Fund Advisors LP和Brandes Investment Partners, LP分別持有6.5%和6.4%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,公司的首席執行官Brian Murphy直接持有0.9%的總流通股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記來看,我們可以看到前11大股東控制着52%的股份,意味着沒有單一股東擁有大多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的觀點以了解市場風向同樣是有意義的。雖然有分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍會變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of American Outdoor Brands
American Outdoor Brands的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然對內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內幕所有權表明領導者像真正的公司所有者那樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高內幕所有權也可能賦予公司內部小集團巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in American Outdoor Brands, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$7.9m worth of stock in the US$170m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board, though we generally prefer to see bigger insider holdings. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股東們可能會感興趣地了解到內部人士擁有American Outdoor Brands, Inc.的股份。內部人士以他們自己的名義擁有價值790萬美元的股票,而該公司的市值爲17000萬美元。有人會說這顯示了股東與董事會之間的利益一致性,儘管我們通常更希望看到更大規模的內部持股。但值得檢查的是,這些內部人士是否在進行賣出交易。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——持有該公司28%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種持股規模可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that American Outdoor Brands is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同群體的情況是非常值得的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,American Outdoor Brands 在我們的投資分析中顯示出一個警告信號,你應該知道……
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。