share_log

Dover Corporation (NYSE:DOV) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%

Dover Corporation (NYSE:DOV) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%

都福集團(紐交所:DOV)在機構投資者中頗受歡迎,擁有87%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  12/10 20:03

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Dover's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 16 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 顯著高的機構持股意味着都福集團的股價對他們的交易行爲敏感。
  • 前16大股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • 內部人士最近出售了股票。

Every investor in Dover Corporation (NYSE:DOV) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 87% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每個都福集團(紐交所:DOV)的投資者應當了解最強大的股東集團。我們可以看到,機構在公司中持有87%的股份。換句話說,這個集團在對公司的投資中最有可能獲得最大收益(或損失最多)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

因爲機構股東擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策通常會受到重視,尤其是對於個人投資者。因此,投資於公司的大量機構資金通常代表着對其未來的巨大信心。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Dover.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了都福的不同股東群體。

big
NYSE:DOV Ownership Breakdown December 10th 2024
紐交所:DOV 股東結構 2024年12月10日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dover?

機構持股告訴我們關於都福什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

We can see that Dover does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Dover, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到都福確實有機構投資者;他們持有相當一部分公司的股票。這在專業投資者中暗示了一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出不好的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖出售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得查看都福過去的盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他需要考慮的因素。

big
NYSE:DOV Earnings and Revenue Growth December 10th 2024
紐交所:都福集團2024年12月的收益和營業收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Dover. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. With 7.1% and 6.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and JP Morgan Asset Management are the second and third largest shareholders.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以集體發揮重要的影響力。我們注意到對都福集團的對沖基金投資並不顯著。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是先鋒集團,持有12%的股份。貝萊德和JP摩根資產管理分別是第二和第三大股東,持有7.1%和6.4%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 16 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的調查,我們發現前16大股東合計擁有公司50%的股份,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有顯著的控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Dover

都福集團的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然對內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內幕所有權表明領導者像真正的公司所有者那樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高內幕所有權也可能賦予公司內部小集團巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Dover Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$112m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,都是集團的內部人士持有不到1%的股份。作爲一家大型公司,我們只期望內部人士持有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值11200萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出會更有趣。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Dover. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆一般是指個人投資者,他們在都福集團持有13%的股份。雖然這一群體不一定能主導決策,但確實可以對公司運營產生真實的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Dover (including 1 which is potentially serious) .

雖然考慮持有一家公司的不同股東群體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素甚至更爲重要。爲此,您應該了解我們發現的都福集團的三個警告信號(包括一個可能嚴重的問題)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論