Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on AngioDynamics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ANGO) With 74% Ownership
Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on AngioDynamics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ANGO) With 74% Ownership
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies AngioDynamics' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
- Recent purchases by insiders
- 顯著的高比例機構持股意味着AngioDynamics的股價對他們的交易行爲敏感。
- 前13大股東持有該業務的51%。
- 近期內部人士的購買。
Every investor in AngioDynamics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ANGO) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 74% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位投資者在AngioDynamics, Inc.(納斯達克:ANGO)中都應該了解最強大的股東群體。機構持有74%的股份,是公司最大股東。換句話說,該集團在投資公司的過程中將獲得最大的利益(或面臨最大的損失)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$284m in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 25%.
上週,機構投資者在公司市值達到28400萬美金時,最終獲得了最大的收益。上週的收益將進一步提升當前股東的年度回報率,目前爲25%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of AngioDynamics, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解AngioDynamics的每種所有者類型,首先是下面的圖表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AngioDynamics?
機構持股對AngioDynamics的啓示是什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
We can see that AngioDynamics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at AngioDynamics' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到AngioDynamics確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一部分。這暗示這些機構的分析師已經關注了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但是,就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看一下AngioDynamics的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. It looks like hedge funds own 5.5% of AngioDynamics shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.9% and 5.6% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO James Clemmer is the owner of 1.2% of the company's shares.
投資者應該注意,機構其實擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們能 collectively 擁有顯著的權力。看起來對沖基金擁有 AngioDynamics 5.5%的股份。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來能夠爲股東創造短期價值的變化。貝萊德目前是最大股東,擁有11%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有大約5.9%和5.6%的股票。此外,首席執行官詹姆斯·克萊默擁有公司1.2%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記,我們可以看到前13大股東控制了51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是合理的,但研究分析師意見也很有意義,以了解趨勢如何。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,因此你可以很輕鬆地查看預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of AngioDynamics
AngioDynamics 的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
儘管內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層對董事會負責,而後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內幕所有權表明領導者像真正的公司所有者那樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高內幕所有權也可能賦予公司內部小集團巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in AngioDynamics, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$9.6m worth of the US$284m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
股東們可能會有興趣了解,內部人士在AngioDynamics, Inc.持有股份。作爲個人,內部人士總共擁有價值960萬美元的股份,公司的市值爲28400萬美元。這至少顯示出一定程度的共識。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over AngioDynamics. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆股東持有17%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對AngioDynamics有一定的影響力。儘管這種持股規模可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以在公司政策上產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得研究到底是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史。您也可以通過訪問這張免費圖表,查看歷史營業收入和收益的詳細圖形。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。