Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 79% of the Company
Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 79% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Emerson Electric implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 25 shareholders own 47% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 機構在艾默生電氣的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有顯著影響。
- 前25大股東擁有該公司47%的股份。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
Every investor in Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 79% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
艾默生電氣公司(紐交所:EMR)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有79%的股份,成爲最大的股東。換句話說,該集團在對公司的投資中,最有可能獲得最大收益(或承受最大損失)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Emerson Electric.
在下圖中,我們放大艾默生電氣的不同所有權集團。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Emerson Electric?
機構持有情況對艾默生電氣有什麼啓示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Emerson Electric. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Emerson Electric's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如您所見,機構投資者在艾默生電氣中擁有相當的股份。這可以表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好對依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。他們有時也會出錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得關注艾默生電氣的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是最重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Emerson Electric. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.3% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.5% by the third-largest shareholder.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以集體發揮顯著的權力。我們注意到對艾默生電氣的對沖基金並沒有進行重大投資。先鋒集團目前是最大的股東,持有9.3%的流通股。作爲對比,第二大股東持有約6.3%的流通股,第三大股東擁有4.5%的股份。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Emerson Electric
艾默生電氣的內部股東持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that Emerson Electric Co. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$256m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的信息顯示,艾默生電氣公司的內部人士擁有不到1%的股份。由於公司如此龐大,我們不期望內部人士擁有大量股票。總體而言,他們持有25600萬美元的股票。看到董事會成員持有股份是件好事,但檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入也是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Emerson Electric. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有艾默生電氣21%的股份。雖然這個群體不一定能夠決定大局,但他們確實可以對公司的運行產生真實的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Emerson Electric better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Emerson Electric you should be aware of.
考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解艾默生電氣,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如:我們發現了3個你應該注意的艾默生電氣的警告信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。