Donaldson Company, Inc.'s (NYSE:DCI) Institutional Investors Lost 6.6% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Donaldson Company, Inc.'s (NYSE:DCI) Institutional Investors Lost 6.6% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Donaldson Company's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 顯著高的機構持股意味着唐納森公司的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感
- 前15大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Donaldson Company, Inc. (NYSE:DCI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 86% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制着唐納森公司(紐交所:DCI),了解業務的所有權結構是很重要的。而持有最大股份的機構擁有86%的股份。換句話說,這個群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多的收益(或承擔最多的損失)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$645m last week. However, the 18% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
機構投資者在公司市值上週下降64500萬美元后遭遇了最大的損失。然而,對於股東來說,18%的一年回報可能緩解了這一打擊。然而,他們應該對未來可能出現的進一步損失保持警惕。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Donaldson Company.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注唐納森公司的不同股權結構。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Donaldson Company?
機構持有對我們了解唐納森公司有什麼啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Donaldson Company already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Donaldson Company's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
唐納森公司已經在股票登記中有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司的股份相當可觀。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經對該股票進行了研究,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能會犯錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們在進行「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司來說,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到唐納森公司的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更爲複雜。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Donaldson Company. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.0% and 7.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 對沖基金在唐納森公司沒有多少股份。 先鋒集團目前是該公司的最大股東,持有11%的流通股份。 與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有9.0%和7.8%的流通股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔細觀察我們的股權拆分數據表明,前15大股東持有的股權總和爲50%,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Donaldson Company
唐納森公司的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that Donaldson Company, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$50m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,唐納森公司內部人士擁有公司不到1%的股份。由於公司規模如此龐大,我們不期望內部人士持有大量股票。總的來說,他們擁有5000萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出會更有趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Donaldson Company has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他因素甚至更加重要。以風險爲例——唐納森公司有一個我們認爲你應該注意的警告信號。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。