Painful Week for Private Equity Firms Invested in Sigma Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:SGML) After 14% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses
Painful Week for Private Equity Firms Invested in Sigma Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:SGML) After 14% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses
Key Insights
主要見解
- Sigma Lithium's significant private equity firms ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
- Institutions own 37% of Sigma Lithium
- Sigma 鋰礦的股權投資公司大幅持有,表明關鍵決策受到大型公衆股東的影響。
- 共有3家投資者擁有該公司53%的股權。
- 機構持有Sigma鋰礦37%的股份。
Every investor in Sigma Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:SGML) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private equity firms own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每個Sigma鋰礦公司的投資者(納斯達克:SGML)都應了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,股權投資公司在公司中持有43%的絕對股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Following a 14% decrease in the stock price last week, private equity firms suffered the most losses, but institutions who own 37% stock also took a hit.
在上週股價下降14%之後,股權投資公司遭受了最大的損失,但擁有37%股票的機構也受到影響。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Sigma Lithium.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Sigma鋰礦的情況。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sigma Lithium?
機構所有權告訴我們關於Sigma鋰礦的哪些信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Sigma Lithium. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Sigma Lithium's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Sigma鋰礦中擁有相當的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,並且他們對其看好。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在它們在'擁擠交易'中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這個風險更高。你可以在下面看到Sigma鋰礦的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,背後的故事總是更多。
Sigma Lithium is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that A10 Investimentos Ltda. is the largest shareholder with 43% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.9% and 4.8% of the stock.
Sigma Lithium並不被對沖基金持有。我們的數據顯示,A10 Investimentos Ltda.是最大的股東,持有43%的流通股。與此相比,第二和第三大股東分別持有約4.9%和4.8%的股票。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前3大股東共控制了公司股份的一半以上,這意味着他們有相當大的權力來影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Sigma Lithium
Sigma Lithium的內部人持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Sigma Lithium Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$35m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
股東們可能會對了解到內部人士擁有Sigma Lithium Corporation的股份感興趣。內部人士持有價值3500萬美元的重大股份。大多數人會將此視爲真正的積極因素。如果您想探討內部人員一致性的問題,可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Sigma Lithium. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Sigma Lithium 14%的股份。雖然這一群體不一定能作出決定,但它確實可以對公司的運行產生真正的影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 43% stake in Sigma Lithium. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
股權投資公司持有Sigma Lithium 43%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可能會有影響力。有時我們看到股權投資長期存在,但一般來說,他們的投資視野較短——正如其名稱所示——並不太投資於公衆公司。經過一段時間後,他們可能會選擇賣出並在其他地方重新部署資本。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 3.1%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到私營公司擁有3.1%的已發行股份。私營公司可能是相關方。有時內部人士通過持有私營公司的股份,而不是以個人身份與公衆公司有利益關係。儘管很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是這是一個進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Sigma Lithium better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Sigma Lithium .
始終值得考慮不同群體在公司中持有的股份。但要更好地理解Sigma Lithium,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該注意到我們發現的Sigma Lithium的1個警告信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。