share_log

Lincoln National Corporation (NYSE:LNC) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 76%

Lincoln National Corporation (NYSE:LNC) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 76%

林肯國民公司 (紐交所:LNC) 是機構投資者的寵兒,他們擁有76%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  12/06 23:04

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lincoln National's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 22 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 顯著高的機構持有意味着林肯國民的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感。
  • 22個投資者持有該公司的51%所有權。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Lincoln National Corporation (NYSE:LNC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 76% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制着林肯國民公司(紐交所:LNC),很重要的是要理解該業務的所有權結構。 持有公司最多股票的群體,約佔76%,是機構。 也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將受益最多(或者在下跌時將損失最多)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lincoln National.

在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於林肯國民的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:LNC Ownership Breakdown December 6th 2024
紐交所:LNC 所有權分佈 2024年12月6日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lincoln National?

機構所有權告訴我們關於林肯國民的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lincoln National. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lincoln National's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在林肯國民中擁有相當可觀的股份。這在專業投資者中暗示了一定的可信度。但我們不能單單依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,查看林肯國民的歷史收益記錄是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:LNC Earnings and Revenue Growth December 6th 2024
紐交所:LNC 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年12月6日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lincoln National. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.7% and 3.7% of the stock.

機構投資者持有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可以強有力地影響董事會的決策。對沖基金在林肯國民的股份並不多。公司的最大股東是先鋒集團,持有11%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約9.7%和3.7%的股票。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 22 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的持有數據進行更深入的分析表明,前22大股東的持有總量爲51%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Lincoln National

林肯國民的內部持有情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Lincoln National Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$43m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有林肯國民公司的股份少於1%。這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員可能會在公司中擁有有意義的利益,而不需要擁有多少相應的股份。在這種情況下,他們持有約4300萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到至少有一些內部持股總是好的,但值得查看這些內部人士是否在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lincoln National. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆以24%的股權,主要由個人投資者組成,對林肯國民公司有一定影響。雖然這個群體不能完全掌控,但確實可以對公司的運行產生真實的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Lincoln National (at least 1 which is significant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。比如,始終存在的投資風險。我們已識別出林肯國民的3個警告信號(至少有1個是顯著的),理解這些應該是你投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論