share_log

Is LKQ (NASDAQ:LKQ) Using Too Much Debt?

Is LKQ (NASDAQ:LKQ) Using Too Much Debt?

LKQ (納斯達克:LKQ) 是否運用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  12/06 19:35

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that LKQ Corporation (NASDAQ:LKQ) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

霍華德·馬克斯很恰當地說,與其擔心股票價格的波動,"我擔心的風險是永久性損失的可能性……而我認識的每個實際投資者也都在擔心這個。" 所以聰明的錢知道,債務——通常涉及破產——在評估一家公司的風險時是一個非常重要的因素。我們可以看到,LKQ公司(納斯達克:LKQ)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但是,這項債務對股東來說是個問題嗎?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

當企業無法通過自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資本來輕鬆履行債務和其他負債時,債務和其他負債就變得高風險。在最壞的情況下,如果企業無法償還債權人,它可能會破產。雖然這種情況並不常見,但我們經常看到負債企業因爲債權人迫使其以低價籌集資本而導致股東權益永久稀釋。當然,債務的好處是它通常代表廉價資本,特別是當它取代以高回報率進行再投資的公司稀釋時。在考慮企業使用多少債務時,首先要看它的現金和債務情況。

How Much Debt Does LKQ Carry?

LKQ公司揹負多少債務?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that LKQ had US$4.23b in debt in September 2024; about the same as the year before. However, it does have US$353.0m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$3.88b.

下面的圖表可以點擊以獲取更詳細的信息,顯示截至2024年9月,LKQ的債務爲42.3億美金;大約與前一年相同。但是,它有35300萬美金的現金抵消這部分,導致淨債務約爲38.8億美金。

big
NasdaqGS:LKQ Debt to Equity History December 6th 2024
納斯達克:LKQ債務與股權歷史 2024年12月6日

A Look At LKQ's Liabilities

看看LKQ的負債情況

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that LKQ had liabilities of US$2.99b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$6.23b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$353.0m in cash and US$1.34b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$7.52b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

通過最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到LKQ的負債爲29.9億美元,需在12個月內償還,超出這一期限的負債爲62.3億美元。抵消這一點的是,其中有35300萬美元的現金和13.4億美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,LKQ的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出75.2億美元。

This is a mountain of leverage even relative to its gargantuan market capitalization of US$10.3b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

這是一筆巨額的槓桿,甚至相對於其103億美元的巨型市值來說。這表明,如果公司需要迅速鞏固資產負債表,股東將會受到嚴重稀釋。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

LKQ has net debt worth 2.2 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 4.8 times the interest expense. While these numbers do not alarm us, it's worth noting that the cost of the company's debt is having a real impact. Unfortunately, LKQ saw its EBIT slide 7.4% in the last twelve months. If that earnings trend continues then its debt load will grow heavy like the heart of a polar bear watching its sole cub. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if LKQ can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

LKQ的淨債務是EBITDA的2.2倍,這並不算太高,但其利息覆蓋率似乎有點低,EBIT僅爲利息支出的4.8倍。雖然這些數字並未讓我們感到震驚,但值得注意的是,公司的債務成本確實產生了影響。不幸的是,LKQ在過去12個月中EBIT下降了7.4%。如果這種盈利趨勢繼續,那麼其債務負擔將如同一隻看着唯一小熊崽的北極熊的心一樣沉重。分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。但最終,企業的未來盈利能力將決定LKQ是否能夠隨時間加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你關注未來,可以查看這份展示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, LKQ produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 60% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,公司只能用冷硬現金而不是會計利潤償還債務。所以我們總是檢查EBIt中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在過去的三年中,LKQ產生了穩健的自由現金流,相當於其EBIt的60%,與我們的預期相當。這筆冷硬現金意味着它可以在想要的時候減少債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Neither LKQ's ability to grow its EBIT nor its level of total liabilities gave us confidence in its ability to take on more debt. But it seems to be able to convert EBIT to free cash flow without much trouble. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that LKQ is taking some risks with its use of debt. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for LKQ you should know about.

無論是LKQ增長其EBIT的能力,還是其總負債水平,都讓我們對其承擔更多債務的能力沒有信心。但它似乎能夠輕鬆地將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流。考慮到我們討論的所有因素,我們認爲LKQ在使用債務時承擔了一些風險。雖然這筆債務可以提升回報,但我們認爲公司現在已經有足夠的槓桿。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但歸根結底,每家公司都可能存在資產負債表之外的風險。這些風險可能很難察覺。每家公司都有這些風險,而我們發現了LKQ的2個警告信號,您應該了解。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

每天結束時,通常更好地關注那些沒有淨債務的公司。您可以查看我們特別名單上的這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長記錄)。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論