American States Water Company's (NYSE:AWR) US$107m Market Value Fall May Be Overlooked by Institutional Investors After a Year of 2.4% Returns
American States Water Company's (NYSE:AWR) US$107m Market Value Fall May Be Overlooked by Institutional Investors After a Year of 2.4% Returns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in American States Water implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構在美國州立水務的重大持股意味着他們對公司的股價有顯著影響。
- 前10大股東持有51%的股份。
- 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of American States Water Company (NYSE:AWR) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 81% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看美國州立水務公司(紐交所:AWR)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。 持有公司最多股份的群體,準確來說約爲81%,是機構。 換句話說,這個群體在對公司的投資中將獲得最多的收益(或承受最多的損失)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$107m last week. Still, the 2.4% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
機構投資者在公司市值上週下跌10700萬美元后遭受了最高損失。不過,2.4%的年度收益可能有助於減輕他們的整體損失。然而,他們應該對未來進一步的損失保持警惕。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of American States Water.
在下圖中,我們縮放了美國州立水務的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About American States Water?
機構所有權告訴我們關於美國州立水務的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that American States Water does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of American States Water, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到美國州立水務確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司相當一部分的股票。這意味着這些機構的分析師已經關注了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者嘗試同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不少見。所以查看美國州立水務的過去盈利軌跡是值得的(如下所示)。當然,考慮其他因素也是很重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in American States Water. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 18%. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 5.5% of the company stock.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以共同擁有顯著的權力。對沖基金在美國州立水務中沒有很多股份。公司的最大股東是黑巖公司,持有18%的股份。先鋒集團是第二大股東,持有13%的普通股,而道富銀行全球顧問公司大約持有5.5%的公司股票。
We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進一步了解到,前10大股東持有通富微電大約51%的註冊資本,這意味着除了大股東,還有一些小股東,能夠在某種程度上平衡彼此的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以了解風向正在往哪裏吹。雖然有一些分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍然會變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of American States Water
美國州立水務的內幕持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of American States Water Company in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$30m worth of shares. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士在美國州立水務公司的持股不到1%。這是一家大公司,所以即使是小比例的持股也能在董事會和股東之間創造一致性。在這種情況下,內部人士持有價值3000萬美元的股票。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
我覺得看看誰擁有公司很有趣。但是,要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,風險 - 江蘇澤宇智能動力股份有限公司有2個警告標誌(1個非常重要),我們認爲您應該知道。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand American States Water better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for American States Water you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.
考慮擁有公司股票的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解美國州立水務,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。舉個例子:我們發現了針對美國州立水務的3個警告信號,您需要注意,其中1個可能是嚴重的。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。