John Coustas Danaos Corporation's (NYSE:DAC) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 3.5%last Week
John Coustas Danaos Corporation's (NYSE:DAC) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 3.5%last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Danaos' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- The top 2 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Institutions own 21% of Danaos
- 達那俄斯的顯著內部持股表明對公司擴張的內在利益
- 前2名股東擁有該公司的52%。
- 機構持有達那俄斯21%的股份
If you want to know who really controls Danaos Corporation (NYSE:DAC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制着達那俄斯公司(紐交所:DAC),那麼你就需要看看其股東名冊的構成。擁有公司最多股份的集團,確切地說約佔50%,是各位個人內部持股者。換句話說,這個集團將最有可能獲益(或損失)於他們對公司的投資。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$54m last week.
顯然,上週公司市值上漲了5400萬美元后,內部人受益最多。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Danaos.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東對達那俄斯能告訴我們什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Danaos?
機構持股告訴我們關於達那俄斯的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Danaos does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Danaos, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到達那俄斯確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的一大部分股票。 這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。 但是,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。 他們有時也會犯錯。 如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。 因此,值得檢查達那俄斯的過去收益軌跡(如下)。 當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。
Danaos is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO John Coustas is the largest shareholder with 48% of shares outstanding. Acadian Asset Management LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 3.4% of common stock, and RBF Capital LLC holds about 2.2% of the company stock.
達那俄斯不是由對沖基金持有。該公司的首席執行官約翰·庫斯塔斯是最大的股東,持有48%的股份。 美國Acadian資產管理有限責任公司是第二大股東,擁有3.4%的普通股,而RBF Capital LLC持有該公司股份的約2.2%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前兩個股東共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,說明他們有相當大的影響力來影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以了解風向正在往哪裏吹。雖然有一些分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍然會變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Danaos
達那俄斯的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Danaos Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.6b, and insiders have US$771m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部持有達那俄斯公司相當比例的股份。其市值僅爲16億美元,內部人士名下擁有77100萬美元的股份,這相當顯著。大多數人會說,在這樣規模的公司中,這顯示出與股東有良好的契合度。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 30% stake in Danaos. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通投資者,通常是個人投資者,在達那俄斯持有30%的股份。雖然這個所有權規模可能不足以左右政策決定向他們傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Danaos (of which 2 can't be ignored!) you should know about.
儘管考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。比如風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現達那俄斯有3個警示信號(其中2個不容忽視!),您應該知道這些。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。