Investors in BorgWarner (NYSE:BWA) Have Unfortunately Lost 12% Over the Last Three Years
Investors in BorgWarner (NYSE:BWA) Have Unfortunately Lost 12% Over the Last Three Years
Many investors define successful investing as beating the market average over the long term. But its virtually certain that sometimes you will buy stocks that fall short of the market average returns. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term BorgWarner Inc. (NYSE:BWA) shareholders, since the share price is down 26% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 26%.
許多投資者將成功投資定義爲在長期內超越市場平均水平。但是幾乎可以肯定的是,有時你會買入那些收益低於市場平均水平的股票。不幸的是,對於長期的博格華納公司(紐交所:BWA)股東而言,這種情況已持續了更長時間,因爲在過去三年中,股價下跌了26%,遠低於約26%的市場回報。
It's worthwhile assessing if the company's economics have been moving in lockstep with these underwhelming shareholder returns, or if there is some disparity between the two. So let's do just that.
值得評估公司的經濟狀況是否與這些不盡如人意的股東回報同時發展並步調一致,或者兩者之間是否存在差異。因此,讓我們來看看。
There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).
市場有時無疑是高效的,但價格並不總是反映基礎業務表現。 一種檢查市場情緒如何隨時間改變的方法是查看公司的股價與每股收益(EPS)之間的互動。
Although the share price is down over three years, BorgWarner actually managed to grow EPS by 9.2% per year in that time. This is quite a puzzle, and suggests there might be something temporarily buoying the share price. Or else the company was over-hyped in the past, and so its growth has disappointed.
儘管股價在三年內下跌,博格華納實際上在此期間每年實現了9.2%的每股收益增長。這確實令人困惑,並且暗示可能有一些暫時的因素在支撐股價。或者,公司過去被過度炒作,因此其增長令人失望。
Since the change in EPS doesn't seem to correlate with the change in share price, it's worth taking a look at other metrics.
由於EPS的變化似乎與股價的變化不相關,因此值得查看其他指標。
The modest 1.3% dividend yield is unlikely to be guiding the market view of the stock. The company has kept revenue pretty healthy over the last three years, so we doubt that explains the falling share price. There doesn't seem to be any clear correlation between the fundamental business metrics and the share price. That could mean that the stock was previously overrated, or it could spell opportunity now.
適度的1.3%分紅派息收益率不太可能指導市場對這隻股票的看法。公司在過去三年裏保持了相當健康的營業收入,因此我們懷疑這並不能解釋股價的下跌。基本的業務指標與股價之間似乎沒有明顯的相關性。這可能意味着這隻股票之前被高估,或者現在可能是一個機會。
The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).
以下圖片顯示了收益和營收隨時間的變化(如果你點擊圖片,可以看到更詳細的信息)。
BorgWarner is a well known stock, with plenty of analyst coverage, suggesting some visibility into future growth. You can see what analysts are predicting for BorgWarner in this interactive graph of future profit estimates.
博格華納是一隻知名的股票,有很多分析師的覆蓋,顯示出未來增長的一定可見性。您可以在這個互動圖表中查看分析師對博格華納未來利潤預估的預測。
What About Dividends?
關於分紅派息的問題
As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. We note that for BorgWarner the TSR over the last 3 years was -12%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.
除了測量股價回報,投資者還應該考慮總股東回報(TSR)。而股價回報僅反映股價的變化,TSR則包括分紅的價值(假定它們被再投資)和任何折價資本籌集或分拆的收益。可以說,TSR提供了一個更全面的股票回報圖景。我們注意到博格華納在過去三年的TSR爲-12%,這比上述提到的股價回報要好。公司支付的分紅因此提升了總股東回報。
A Different Perspective
另一種看法
BorgWarner shareholders are up 4.0% for the year (even including dividends). But that return falls short of the market. But at least that's still a gain! Over five years the TSR has been a reduction of 0.9% per year, over five years. It could well be that the business is stabilizing. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for BorgWarner that you should be aware of before investing here.
博格華納的股東今年上漲了4.0%(即使包括分紅派息)。但這個回報低於市場。至少這仍然是一個收益!在過去五年中,總回報率每年減少了0.9%。這有可能表明業務正在穩定。 我發現從長期來看,股價作爲業務表現的代理指標非常有趣。不過,要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了博格華納的兩個警告信號,在投資之前你應該了解這些。
For those who like to find winning investments this free list of undervalued companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.
對於那些喜歡尋找獲勝投資的人來說,最近有內部購買的低估公司免費列表可能是一個很好的選擇。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。