M&T Bank Corporation (NYSE:MTB) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 89% of the Company
M&T Bank Corporation (NYSE:MTB) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 89% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, M&T Bank's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
- Recent sales by insiders
- 由於機構在股票中持有大量股份,M&t銀行的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前10大股東持有50%的股份。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
A look at the shareholders of M&T Bank Corporation (NYSE:MTB) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 89% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
觀察M&t銀行公司(紐交所:MTB)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。 持有公司最多股份的群體,約佔89%,是機構。 換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about M&T Bank.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於M&t銀行的事情。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About M&T Bank?
機構所有權能告訴我們關於M&t銀行的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in M&T Bank. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of M&T Bank, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在M&t銀行擁有相當的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽。然而,最好謹慎對待所需的機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試賣出股票,看到股價大幅下跌是很常見的。因此,值得檢查一下M&t銀行過去的盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,還要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in M&T Bank. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.7% of common stock, and Wellington Management Group LLP holds about 6.0% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 對沖基金在M&t銀行的持股不多。 先鋒集團目前是該公司的最大股東,持有12%的流通股。 貝萊德公司是第二大股東,持有7.7%的普通股,而威靈頓管理集團則持有大約6.0%的公司股票。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前10大股東持有超過半數股份,有一些較小的股東以一定程度上平衡更大股東的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of M&T Bank
M&t銀行的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of M&T Bank Corporation. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$163m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有少於1%的M&t銀行公司的股份。 由於這是一家大公司,我們只會期望內部人士擁有一個小比例的股份。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值16300萬美元的股票。 可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over M&T Bank. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆擁有10%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對M&t銀行有一定的影響力。 這個持股比例雖然相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand M&T Bank better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - M&T Bank has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
始終值得考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體。但要更好地理解M&t銀行,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例——M&t銀行有一個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。