Returns On Capital At Weibo (NASDAQ:WB) Paint A Concerning Picture
Returns On Capital At Weibo (NASDAQ:WB) Paint A Concerning Picture
Finding a business that has the potential to grow substantially is not easy, but it is possible if we look at a few key financial metrics. Amongst other things, we'll want to see two things; firstly, a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an expansion in the company's amount of capital employed. This shows us that it's a compounding machine, able to continually reinvest its earnings back into the business and generate higher returns. Having said that, from a first glance at Weibo (NASDAQ:WB) we aren't jumping out of our chairs at how returns are trending, but let's have a deeper look.
尋找一個潛在能夠大幅增長的業務並不容易,但如果我們關注幾個關鍵財務指標,這是可能的。在其他方面,我們希望看到兩件事情;首先,資本回報率(ROCE)在增長,其次,公司所用資本的增加。這向我們表明它是一個複利機器,能夠持續將收益再投資於業務中,產生更高的回報。話雖如此,從初步觀察微博(納斯達克:WB)來看,我們對回報的趨勢並沒有感到興奮,但讓我們深入看看。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
資本利用率(ROCE)是什麼?
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. To calculate this metric for Weibo, this is the formula:
對於那些不知道的人,ROCE是公司年度稅前利潤(其回報)與所用資本的比率。要計算微博的這一指標,公式如下:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)
0.088 = US$495m ÷ (US$6.6b - US$969m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.088 = US$49500萬 ÷ (US$66億 - US$969m)(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
Therefore, Weibo has an ROCE of 8.8%. On its own that's a low return, but compared to the average of 6.7% generated by the Interactive Media and Services industry, it's much better.
因此,微博的ROCE爲8.8%。單看這一數據,這是一個較低的回報,但與互動媒體及服務行業的平均6.7%相比,它更好。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for Weibo compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Weibo .
在上面,您可以看到微博當前的資本回報率與過去的資本回報率的比較,但從過去的數據中能得出的信息有限。如果您想了解分析師對未來的預測,應該查看我們關於微博的免費分析師報告。
What Does the ROCE Trend For Weibo Tell Us?
微博的資本回報率趨勢告訴我們什麼?
The trend of ROCE doesn't look fantastic because it's fallen from 16% five years ago, while the business's capital employed increased by 48%. However, some of the increase in capital employed could be attributed to the recent capital raising that's been completed prior to their latest reporting period, so keep that in mind when looking at the ROCE decrease. It's unlikely that all of the funds raised have been put to work yet, so as a consequence Weibo might not have received a full period of earnings contribution from it. It's also worth noting the company's latest EBIT figure is within 10% of the previous year, so it's fair to assign the ROCE drop largely to the capital raise.
資本回報率的趨勢看起來並不理想,因爲它從五年前的16%下降,而業務使用的資本增加了48%。但是,使用資本的增加可能與最近完成的融資有關,在他們最新的報告期之前完成,因此在查看資本回報率下降時要考慮這一點。所籌集的資金不太可能全部投入使用,因此微博可能沒有從中獲得完整的收益貢獻。還值得注意的是,該公司最新的EBIT數字與前一年相差不到10%,因此可以合理地將資本回報率的下降主要歸因於資本的增加。
In Conclusion...
最後,同等資本下回報率較低的趨勢通常不是我們關注創業板股票的最佳信號。由於這些發展進行良好,因此投資者不太可能表現友好。自五年前以來,該股下跌了32%。除非這些指標朝着更積極的軌跡轉變,否則我們將繼續尋找其他股票。
In summary, Weibo is reinvesting funds back into the business for growth but unfortunately it looks like sales haven't increased much just yet. And investors may be expecting the fundamentals to get a lot worse because the stock has crashed 75% over the last five years. Therefore based on the analysis done in this article, we don't think Weibo has the makings of a multi-bagger.
總而言之,微博正在將資金重新投資於業務以實現增長,但不幸的是目前銷售似乎並沒有增長。投資者可能預計基本面會變得更加糟糕,因爲該股票在過去五年中下跌了75%。因此,根據本文的分析,我們認爲微博不具備成爲多倍收益股的潛力。
Weibo does have some risks though, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Weibo that you might be interested in.
不過,微博確實存在一些風險,我們發現了一個可能值得您關注的警告信號。
While Weibo isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.
雖然微博的回報率並不是最高的,但可以查看這個免費列表,其中包括那些在股本回報率較高且資產負債表穩健的公司。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。