With 75% Ownership of the Shares, DoorDash, Inc. (NASDAQ:DASH) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 75% Ownership of the Shares, DoorDash, Inc. (NASDAQ:DASH) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, DoorDash's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 考慮到機構在股票中持有大部分股份,doordash的股價可能會受到其交易決定的影響
- 14位最大股東持有該業務的51%。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
To get a sense of who is truly in control of DoorDash, Inc. (NASDAQ:DASH), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 75% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着DoorDash,Inc. (納斯達克:DASH),重要的是要了解業務的所有權結構。 我們可以看到機構擁有該公司75%的所有權份額。 換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構股東擁有巨大的資源池和流動資金,他們的投資決策往往承載着很大的權重,特別是對個人投資者來說。因此,機構投入該公司的資金通常是對其未來的極大信心。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of DoorDash, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解Doordash的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DoorDash?
機構持股告訴我們有關Doordash的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that DoorDash does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of DoorDash, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,Doordash確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的股份的相當大比例。這可能表明公司在投資界享有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們也會偶爾犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試出售某支股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得查看Doordash的過去收入軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in DoorDash. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Sequoia Capital Operations LLC with 7.6% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.8% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Tony Xu is the owner of 2.3% of the company's shares.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對於doordash,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。根據我們的數據,可以看到最大的股東是Sequoia Capital Operations LLC,持有7.6%的流通股。第二大股東持有約7.5%的流通股,第三大股東持有5.8%的流通股。此外,首席執行官Tony Xu擁有公司股份的2.3%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步的調查,我們發現前14名股東持有該公司的51%的股份,這表明沒有單一的股東對該公司擁有重要的控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of DoorDash
DoorDash的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in DoorDash, Inc.. Insiders own US$4.9b worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士持有DoorDash, Inc.的部分股份。 內部人士持有價值49億美元的股份(按照當前價格計算)。 我們有時會對他們是否在買入或賣出感興趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over DoorDash. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
作爲擁有11%股權的大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在DoorDash上擁有一定的影響力。 雖然這個群體不能必然左右公司的決定,但確實可以對公司的運行產生實質影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 7.6% stake in DoorDash. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
股權投資公司持有doordash的7.6%股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策方面可能會發揮影響力。一些投資者可能會因此感到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠促使市場看到該公司的價值。或者,這些持有人可能在公司上市後退出投資。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand DoorDash better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for DoorDash that you should be aware of before investing here.
始終值得考慮公司股東的不同群體。但要更好地了解doordash,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了2個關於doordash的警示信號,您在投資之前應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。