share_log

We Think You Can Look Beyond Vestis' (NYSE:VSTS) Lackluster Earnings

We Think You Can Look Beyond Vestis' (NYSE:VSTS) Lackluster Earnings

我們認爲您可以審視Vestis(紐交所:VSTS)乏味的盈利
Simply Wall St ·  18:45

Vestis Corporation's (NYSE:VSTS) stock was strong despite it releasing a soft earnings report last week. We think that investors might be looking at some positive factors beyond the earnings numbers.

儘管Vestis Corporation(紐交所:VSTS)上週發佈了疲軟的盈利報告,其股票表現依然強勁。我們認爲投資者可能在盈利數字之外看到了一些積極因素。

big
NYSE:VSTS Earnings and Revenue History November 29th 2024
紐交所:VSTS的盈利和營業收入歷史 2024年11月29日

A Closer Look At Vestis' Earnings

深入分析Vestis的盈利情況

Many investors haven't heard of the accrual ratio from cashflow, but it is actually a useful measure of how well a company's profit is backed up by free cash flow (FCF) during a given period. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.

許多投資者沒有聽說過現金流的應計比率,但它實際上是一個有用的衡量公司利潤在一個給定期間內被自由現金流(FCF)支持的度量衡。爲了得到應計比率,我們首先需要在一個期間內將FCF從利潤中減去,然後將該數額除以該期間平均營運資產。您可以認爲現金流應計比率是「非FCF盈利比率」。

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

這意味着負責任的比率爲好事,因爲它表明公司所帶來的自由現金流比利潤所表明的要多。這並不是要暗示我們應該擔心正的負責任率,但值得注意的是,在負責任比率相當高的地方有一些學術證據表明,負責任比率高是近期利潤的一個不好的徵兆。

Vestis has an accrual ratio of -0.17 for the year to September 2024. Therefore, its statutory earnings were very significantly less than its free cashflow. To wit, it produced free cash flow of US$393m during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of US$21.0m. Vestis' free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see.

截至2024年9月,Vestis的應計比率爲-0.17。因此,其法定盈利明顯低於其自由現金流。換句話說,它在此期間生成了39300萬美元的自由現金流,遠超其報告的2100萬美元盈利。Vestis的自由現金流在過去一年中有所改善,這通常是一個好兆頭。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。

Our Take On Vestis' Profit Performance

我們對Vestis利潤表現的看法

As we discussed above, Vestis' accrual ratio indicates strong conversion of profit to free cash flow, which is a positive for the company. Based on this observation, we consider it possible that Vestis' statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! Unfortunately, though, its earnings per share actually fell back over the last year. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. Keep in mind, when it comes to analysing a stock it's worth noting the risks involved. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Vestis (1 is concerning) you should be familiar with.

正如我們上面討論的,Vestis的會計比率表明其利潤轉化爲自由現金流的能力強,這對公司來說是個好消息。根據這一觀察,我們認爲Vestis的法定利潤可能低估了其盈利潛力!不幸的是,其每股收益在過去一年中實際上有所下降。本文的目標是評估我們在多大程度上可以依賴法定收益來反映公司的潛力,但還有很多其他因素需要考慮。請記住,在分析股票時,值得注意的是相關的風險。例如,我們已經確定了Vestis的2個警告信號(其中1個令人擔憂),你應該了解這些情況。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Vestis' profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

此報道僅關注於一個因素,該因素揭示了Vestis利潤的性質。但如果你能夠專注於細節,總有更多發現。一些人認爲高股本回報率是優質業務的良好標誌。因此你可能希望查看這個免費的高股本回報率公司的集合,或是這個擁有高內部持股的股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論