share_log

The Recent 3.8% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Jonathan Weis' Week, Weis Markets, Inc.'s (NYSE:WMK) Most Bullish Insider

The Recent 3.8% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Jonathan Weis' Week, Weis Markets, Inc.'s (NYSE:WMK) Most Bullish Insider

最近3.8%的漲幅一定讓首席執行官喬納森·維斯(Jonathan Weis)的這一週變得更加光明,維斯市場公司(Weis Markets, Inc.)(紐交所:WMK)最看好的內部人士。
Simply Wall St ·  11/28 20:16

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Weis Markets' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 54% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in Weis Markets is 39%
  • 內部人員似乎對韋斯市場的增長有着極大的興趣,因爲他們擁有的股份相當可觀
  • 共有3位投資者持有該公司的54%所有權
  • 機構在韋斯市場的持股比例爲39%

If you want to know who really controls Weis Markets, Inc. (NYSE:WMK), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 39% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道誰真正控制韋斯市場,Inc.(紐交所:WMK),那麼您將不得不看看其股東名冊的構成。 我們可以看到個人內部人員擁有該公司39%的所有權。 換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的潛在收益(或下行風險)。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$72m last week.

顯然,在上週公司市值上漲7200萬美元之後,內部人員獲益最多。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Weis Markets.

讓我們仔細看看韋斯市場的不同類型股東能告訴我們什麼。

big
NYSE:WMK Ownership Breakdown November 28th 2024
紐交所:WMk 所有權分佈2024年11月28日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Weis Markets?

機構所有權告訴我們關於韋斯市場的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Weis Markets already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Weis Markets' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

韋斯市場已經在股東名冊上擁有機構。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,而且他們喜歡它。但與其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看韋斯市場以下的營收歷史數據。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:WMK Earnings and Revenue Growth November 28th 2024
紐交所:韋斯市場2024年11月28日的盈利和營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Weis Markets. The company's CEO Jonathan Weis is the largest shareholder with 39% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.9% and 6.7% of the stock.

我們注意到,對韋斯市場並沒有太多對沖基金投資。該公司CEO喬納森·韋斯持有39%的流通股,是最大的股東。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.9%和6.7%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

總的來說,包括散戶投資者在內,公衆擁有公司的14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

研究機構持股是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的一種好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現相同的目標。我們目前沒有注意到該股票的任何分析師報告,因此該公司不大可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Weis Markets

韋斯市場內部所有權情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Weis Markets, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$774m stake in this US$2.0b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

看起來內部持有韋斯市場的股份相當可觀。看到內部人擁有這家市值20億美元的企業中意義深遠的77400萬美元的股份確實很有意思。大多數人會說,特別是在這樣規模的公司中,這顯示了與股東有很好的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Weis Markets. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

佔有21%股權的普通公衆,大多數是個人投資者,對韋斯市場有一定程度的影響力。雖然這一所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Weis Markets better, we need to consider many other factors.

考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是有價值的。但要更好地了解韋斯市場,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論