Have Insiders Sold Patrick Industries Shares Recently?
Have Insiders Sold Patrick Industries Shares Recently?
We wouldn't blame Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:PATK) shareholders if they were a little worried about the fact that Andy Nemeth, the CEO & Chairman of the Board recently netted about US$4.1m selling shares at an average price of US$137. That sale reduced their total holding by 11% which is hardly insignificant, but far from the worst we've seen.
如果patrstick industries, inc.(納斯達克:PATK)的股東對首席執行官兼董事會主席Andy Nemeth最近以每股約137美元的平均價格淨賣出約410萬美元的股份感到擔憂,我們不會責怪他們。這筆交易使他們的總持有量減少了11%,這並不算微不足道,但也遠非我們見過的最糟糕的情況。
The Last 12 Months Of Insider Transactions At Patrick Industries
過去12個月內Patrick Industries的內部交易情況
Notably, that recent sale by Andy Nemeth is the biggest insider sale of Patrick Industries shares that we've seen in the last year. So what is clear is that an insider saw fit to sell at around the current price of US$134. While insider selling is a negative, to us, it is more negative if the shares are sold at a lower price. In this case, the big sale took place at around the current price, so it's not too bad (but it's still not a positive).
值得注意的是,Andy Nemeth最近的這筆交易是我們在過去一年中看到的patrstick industries股份最大的內部出售。因此,很明顯有內部人士在當前價格約134美元時選擇了賣出。雖然內部銷售是一個負面因素,但對我們來說,如果股份以更低的價格出售,情況會更糟。在這種情況下,大筆銷售發生在當前價格附近,所以並沒有太糟糕(但仍然不是積極的)。
Patrick Industries insiders didn't buy any shares over the last year. You can see a visual depiction of insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last 12 months, below. By clicking on the graph below, you can see the precise details of each insider transaction!
在過去一年中,patrstick industries的內部人士沒有購買任何股份。您可以在下面看到過去12個月內部交易(公司和個人)的可視化表示。通過點擊下面的圖表,您可以查看每筆內部交易的具體細節!
For those who like to find hidden gems this free list of small cap companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.
對於那些喜歡發現潛力股票的人,可以免費查看最新內部交易股票的小盤公司名單,這可能正是您要找的機會。
Does Patrick Industries Boast High Insider Ownership?
Patrick Industries是否擁有高股權制約?
Another way to test the alignment between the leaders of a company and other shareholders is to look at how many shares they own. We usually like to see fairly high levels of insider ownership. Patrick Industries insiders own 4.5% of the company, currently worth about US$138m based on the recent share price. This kind of significant ownership by insiders does generally increase the chance that the company is run in the interest of all shareholders.
測試公司領導與其他股東之間的一致性的一種方法是查看他們持有多少股份。我們通常希望看到相對較高的內部持股水平。patrick industries 的內部人士持有公司4.5%的股份,目前按最近的股價計算,價值約爲13800萬美元。這種內部人士的顯著持股通常會增加公司爲所有股東利益而運行的機會。
So What Does This Data Suggest About Patrick Industries Insiders?
那麼這些數據對patrick industries的內部人士有什麼啓示?
Insiders sold Patrick Industries shares recently, but they didn't buy any. Looking to the last twelve months, our data doesn't show any insider buying. But it is good to see that Patrick Industries is growing earnings. It is good to see high insider ownership, but the insider selling leaves us cautious. So these insider transactions can help us build a thesis about the stock, but it's also worthwhile knowing the risks facing this company. For example - Patrick Industries has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
內部人士最近賣出了patrick industries的股票,但他們沒有買入。查看過去十二個月,我們的數據未顯示任何內部人士的買入情況。但我們很高興看到patrick industries正在增長盈利。高內部持股水平是令人欣慰的,但內部人士的賣出讓我們保持謹慎。因此,這些內部交易可以幫助我們建立對該股票的論文,但同樣了解該公司面臨的風險也是值得的。例如——patrick industries有兩個我們認爲您應該了解的警告信號。
But note: Patrick Industries may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt.
但請注意:Patrick Industries可能不是最好的股票買入,因此請查看這個高roe低債務的有趣公司免費列表。
For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests.
對於本文而言,內部人是指向相關監管機構報告其交易的個人。我們目前僅考慮公開市場交易和直接利益的私人處置,但不包括衍生交易或間接利益。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。