With 57% Ownership, Antero Midstream Corporation (NYSE:AM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 57% Ownership, Antero Midstream Corporation (NYSE:AM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Antero Midstream's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- Recent sales by insiders
- 考慮到機構在股票中的大額股份,antero midstream的股價可能會受到他們的交易決策的影響。
- 前四大股東持有公司50%的股份。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
A look at the shareholders of Antero Midstream Corporation (NYSE:AM) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看antero midstream公司(紐交所:AM)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有57%的股份,擁有絕大部分的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Antero Midstream, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討一下Antero midstream的每種所有者類型,首先是下面的圖表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Antero Midstream?
機構所有權告訴我們關於Antero midstream什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Antero Midstream. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Antero Midstream, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Antero midstream擁有相當程度的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經查看了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能錯。所以當兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖出售一隻股票時,看到大幅股價下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查一下Antero midstream過去的盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Antero Midstream is not owned by hedge funds. Antero Resources Corporation is currently the company's largest shareholder with 29% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.4% by the third-largest shareholder.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會共同強烈影響董事會的決策。 antero midstream不被對沖基金所擁有。 antero resources corporation目前是公司的最大股東,擁有29%的流通股份。 作爲背景,第二大股東約持有8.0%的流通股份,第三大股東的持有比例爲7.4%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Antero Midstream
antero midstream的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Antero Midstream Corporation. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$49m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士持有的安特羅中游公司的股份不到1%。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士持有價值4900萬美元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。可以說,近期的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Antero Midstream. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆持有13%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,因此對安特羅中游有一定的影響力。雖然這種規模的持股可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 29% of Antero Midstream stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
目前,上市公司擁有29%的antero midstream股票。我們不能確定,但很可能這是一個戰略性投資。這些業務可能類似,或者能夠合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Antero Midstream .
我發現研究誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該注意到我們發現的antero midstream的兩個警告信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。