Should You Be Worried About Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s (NYSE:KMI) 8.3% Return On Equity?
Should You Be Worried About Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s (NYSE:KMI) 8.3% Return On Equity?
While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. By way of learning-by-doing, we'll look at ROE to gain a better understanding of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE:KMI).
雖然一些投資者已經熟悉財務指標,但這篇文章是爲那些想了解roe及其重要性的人準備的。通過實踐學習的方式,我們將研究roe,以更好地了解金德爾摩根公司(紐交所:KMI)。
Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders.
淨資產收益率(roe)是衡量公司經營管理層如何有效利用公司資本的關鍵指標。換言之,它是一種利潤率,衡量由公司股東提供的資本的回報率。
How To Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股東權益報酬率?
The formula for ROE is:
roe的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營) ÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Kinder Morgan is:
因此,根據上述公式,金德爾摩根的ROE爲:
8.3% = US$2.6b ÷ US$32b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
8.3% = 26億美元 ÷ 320億美元(截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.08 in profit.
「回報」是過去十二個月的淨利潤。 另一種理解方式是,對於每1美元的資產,公司能夠賺取0.08美元的利潤。
Does Kinder Morgan Have A Good ROE?
金德爾摩根的roe表現如何?
Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Kinder Morgan has a lower ROE than the average (15%) in the Oil and Gas industry classification.
可以說,評估公司roe的最簡單方法是將其與行業平均水平進行比較。 重要的是,這遠非一種完美的衡量標準,因爲在同一行業分類中,公司之間存在顯著差異。 如果您查看下面的圖片,您會看到金德爾摩根的roe低於燃料幣行業平均水平(15%)。
Unfortunately, that's sub-optimal. That being said, a low ROE is not always a bad thing, especially if the company has low leverage as this still leaves room for improvement if the company were to take on more debt. A high debt company having a low ROE is a different story altogether and a risky investment in our books. Our risks dashboard should have the 3 risks we have identified for Kinder Morgan.
不幸的是,這是次優的。 話雖如此,低roe並不總是一件壞事,特別是如果公司槓桿較低,這仍然爲公司提供了改進的空間,如果公司要承擔更多債務。 高債務公司的低roe情況則完全不同,並且在我們看來是一項風險投資。 我們的風險儀表板應該列出我們爲金德爾摩根確定的3個風險。
Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE
爲什麼在觀察ROE時你應該考慮債務問題?
Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
幾乎所有公司都需要資金投資業務,以實現利潤增長。 這些資金可以來自留存收益、發行新股(股本)或債務。 在第一和第二種選擇的情況下,roe將反映出這些資金的使用情況,以促進增長。 在後一種情況下,用於增長的債務將提高回報率,但不會影響股東權益。 這將使roe看起來比不使用債務時更好。
Combining Kinder Morgan's Debt And Its 8.3% Return On Equity
結合金德爾摩根的債務和其8.3%的淨資產收益率
Kinder Morgan does use a high amount of debt to increase returns. It has a debt to equity ratio of 1.01. With a fairly low ROE, and significant use of debt, it's hard to get excited about this business at the moment. Debt increases risk and reduces options for the company in the future, so you generally want to see some good returns from using it.
金德爾摩根確實使用大量債務來增加回報。其債務資本比爲1.01。由於淨資產收益率相對較低且債務使用較多,目前很難對這家企業感到興奮。債務增加風險並減少了企業未來的選擇,因此您通常希望從中獲得一些良好的回報。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.
ROE是比較不同公司業務質量的一種方式。在我們看來,高回報率(ROE)的高質量公司,儘管債務較低。如果兩家公司的ROE相同,則通常會更喜歡債務較少的那家。
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
但當一個企業是高品質時,市場通常會將它競拍到反映這一點的價格。考慮到利潤增長的速度,相對於當前價格所反映的利潤增長預期,也必須加以考慮。因此,我認爲值得查看此公司的分析師預測免費報告。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果您想查看另一家可能具有更好財務狀況的公司 - 具有高股本回報率和低債務的公司,那麼請不要錯過這份有趣公司列表,該列表免費提供。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。