share_log

With 85% Institutional Ownership, Medtronic Plc (NYSE:MDT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 85% Institutional Ownership, Medtronic Plc (NYSE:MDT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

美敦力有85%的機構持股,紐交所股票代碼爲MDT,是大型機構的最愛。
Simply Wall St ·  11/25 23:19

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Medtronic's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 49% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 鑑於機構在該股票中持有大量股份,美敦力的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
  • 共有25家投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,達到49%的持股比例。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

Every investor in Medtronic plc (NYSE:MDT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 85% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

作爲 Medtronic plc(紐交所:MDT)的每位投資者,都應該了解最強有力的股東群體。機構持有公司的85%股份。換句話說,該群體將從他們投資該公司中獲得最多(或損失最多)收益。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構股東擁有巨大的資源池和流動資金,他們的投資決策往往承載着很大的權重,特別是對個人投資者來說。因此,機構投入該公司的資金通常是對其未來的極大信心。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Medtronic.

讓我們仔細看看股東的不同類型可以告訴我們關於美敦力的什麼。

big
NYSE:MDT Ownership Breakdown November 25th 2024
NYSE:MDt所有權分析2024年11月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Medtronic?

機構持有的股權告訴我們什麼關於美敦力?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Medtronic already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Medtronic, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

美敦力已經有機構在股東名冊上。實際上,他們在公司中擁有一部分相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅憑這個事實,因爲有時機構也會犯投資錯誤,就像每個人都會犯一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某隻股票,那麼看到股價大幅下跌也不罕見。因此值得檢查一下美敦力的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:MDT Earnings and Revenue Growth November 25th 2024
美敦力(NYSE:MDt)2024年11月25日盈利和營業收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Medtronic. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.6%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.7% and 4.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過公司一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要影響力。對美敦力,對沖基金持有的股份不多。公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,擁有9.6%的所有權。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有8.7%和4.7%的流通股。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Medtronic

美敦力的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Medtronic plc in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$55m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據顯示,美敦力股份有限公司的內部人士僅以自己的名義持有不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人員持有公司的大部分股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值5500萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人士是在買入還是賣出可能更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Medtronic. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般大衆,通常是個人投資者,在美敦力持有15%的股份。雖然這一持股比例相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Medtronic is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

儘管考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,美敦力在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警示標誌,您應該了解...

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論