Waters (NYSE:WAT) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
Waters (NYSE:WAT) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Waters Corporation (NYSE:WAT) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
霍華德·馬克斯很好地表達了這一點,他說,與其擔心股價波動,不如擔心"永久損失的可能性…這是我擔心的風險…而我認識的每個實際投資者都在擔心。'當我們考慮一家公司有多大風險時,我們總是喜歡看一下它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過多可能導致破產。我們注意到,沃特世公司(NYSE:WAT)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但真正的問題是,這筆債務是否會讓公司變得風險重重。
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
一般來說,只有當公司無法輕鬆償還債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題,要麼通過增加資本,要麼憑藉自身的現金流。 資本主義的一個重要部分是"創造性破壞"的過程,失敗的企業會被它們的銀行無情地清算。 然而,更常見的(但仍然痛苦)情況是,公司需要以低價發行新股權資本,從而永久性地稀釋股東權益。 儘管有稀釋的風險,但債務可以成爲那些需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業的極好工具。 在考慮公司的債務水平時的第一步是同時考慮其現金和債務。
What Is Waters's Net Debt?
沃特世的淨負債是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Waters had US$1.85b of debt in September 2024, down from US$2.51b, one year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$331.5m, its net debt is less, at about US$1.52b.
您可以點擊下方的圖表查看歷史數據,但顯示沃特世在2024年9月擁有18.5億美元的債務,低於一年前的25.1億美元。然而,由於它有33150萬美元的現金儲備,其淨債務較少,約爲15.2億美元。
How Strong Is Waters' Balance Sheet?
沃特世的資產負債表有多牢靠?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Waters had liabilities of US$816.0m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$2.09b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$331.5m in cash and US$669.5m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.91b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
根據最近披露的資產負債表顯示,沃特世有待在12個月內償還的負債爲81600萬美元,以及在12個月後到期的負債爲20.9億美元。 相應的,它有33150萬美元的現金和66950萬美元的應收款項在12個月內到期。 因此,其負債總計比其現金和近期應收賬款總和多了19.1億美元。
Since publicly traded Waters shares are worth a very impressive total of US$22.2b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.
由於公開交易的沃特世股票總值爲222億美元,看來這種水平的負債不太可能構成重大威脅。 但是,我們認爲值得關注其資產負債表的強弱,因爲隨着時間的推移可能會發生變化。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。
With a debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.5, Waters uses debt artfully but responsibly. And the alluring interest cover (EBIT of 9.7 times interest expense) certainly does not do anything to dispel this impression. On the other hand, Waters saw its EBIT drop by 7.2% in the last twelve months. If earnings continue to decline at that rate the company may have increasing difficulty managing its debt load. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Waters can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
憑藉1.5的債務/EBITDA比率,沃特世在債務上巧妙而負責任地運用債務。 吸引人的利息支付倍數(EBIt是利息費用的9.7倍)確實沒有消除這種印象。 另一方面,沃特世在過去12個月中看到其EBIt下降了7.2%。 如果收益繼續以這個速度下降,公司可能會越來越難以管理其債務負擔。 在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是開始的明顯地方。 但最終業務的未來盈利能力將決定沃特世是否能隨着時間而加強其資產負債表。 因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師盈利預測的免費報告。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Waters produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 58% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.
最後,一家企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不能解決問題。 因此,看起來合理的下一步是看看那些EBIt中匹配實際自由現金流的比例。 在過去的三年中,沃特世產生了穩健的自由現金流,相當於其EBIt的58%,這正是我們所期望的。 這筆冷硬現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
On our analysis Waters's interest cover should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. But the other factors we noted above weren't so encouraging. For example, its EBIT growth rate makes us a little nervous about its debt. When we consider all the elements mentioned above, it seems to us that Waters is managing its debt quite well. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Waters that you should be aware of before investing here.
根據我們對沃特世的利息覆蓋情況分析,表明其在處理債務方面不會遇到太多麻煩。但我們上面提到的其他因素並不那麼令人鼓舞。例如,其EBIt增長率讓我們對其債務感到有些緊張。綜合考慮以上提到的所有要素,我們認爲沃特世在處理債務方面表現相當不錯。但需要謹慎的一點是:我們認爲債務水平已經足夠高,需要持續監控。毫無疑問,從資產負債表上我們可以了解大部分關於債務的情況。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表範圍的風險。例如,我們發現了1個沃特世的警示信號,您在投資之前應該注意。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。