share_log

With 89% Institutional Ownership, Analog Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ:ADI) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 89% Institutional Ownership, Analog Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ:ADI) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

擁有89%的機構持股,模擬器件公司(納斯達克:ADI)是大佬們最喜愛的選擇
Simply Wall St ·  11/25 19:28

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Analog Devices' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 24 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 由於機構在股票中的大量持股,亞德諾的股票價格可能會受到他們的交易決策的影響。
  • 共有24名投資者在公司中擁有51%的大部分股權。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of Analog Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ:ADI) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 89% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

查看亞德諾(納斯達克:ADI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。持有公司最多股份的群體,準確來說,大約是89%,就是機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將受益最多(或者在市場下滑時損失最多)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構具有龐大的資本量,他們的市場動作往往會受到零售或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,在一家公司中擁有大量機構投資往往被視爲一個理想的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Analog Devices, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入分析亞德諾各種類型的所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:ADI Ownership Breakdown November 25th 2024
納斯達克GS:ADI 所有權分解 2024年11月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Analog Devices?

機構所有權告訴我們關於亞德諾什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Analog Devices. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Analog Devices' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在亞德諾持有相當可觀的股份。這意味着這些機構的分析師關注了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在它們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方可能會競爭快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到亞德諾的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,總還有更多故事。

big
NasdaqGS:ADI Earnings and Revenue Growth November 25th 2024
納斯達克GS:ADI 業績與營業收入增長 2024年11月25日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Analog Devices is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.8% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.8% and 4.5% of the stock.

投資者應該注意到,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此它們可以共同發揮重要的影響力。 亞德諾並不被對沖基金所擁有。 先鋒集團目前是公司最大的股東,持有9.8%的流通股份。 相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約7.8%和4.5%的股票。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 24 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記冊,我們可以看到前24位股東控制了51%的股份,這意味着沒有任何單一股東在所有權中擁有多數權益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Analog Devices

亞德諾的內部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Analog Devices, Inc. in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$404m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義持有亞德諾公司不到1%的股份。由於這是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士持有其中一小部分股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值40400萬美元的股票。看到至少一些內部人士的持股總是好的,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有公司的10%股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以在其方面左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Analog Devices you should know about.

我發現查看公司真正的所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 例如,考慮風險。每個公司都有風險,我們發現了關於亞德諾的兩個警告信號,你應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論