Dorian LPG Ltd.'s (NYSE:LPG) Latest 8.5% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures
Dorian LPG Ltd.'s (NYSE:LPG) Latest 8.5% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, DorianG's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 鑑於機構在該股票中擁有較大股權,DorianG的股價可能會受到它們交易決策的影響
- 前13大股東持有該業務的51%。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
If you want to know who really controls Dorian LPG Ltd. (NYSE:LPG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 70% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道誰真正控制着dorian lpg有限公司(紐約證券交易所:lpg),那麼您就必須查看其股東註冊情況。我們可以看到,機構擁有公司中的大部分股權,佔比70%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲益最多(或在市場走低時損失最大)。
And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.1b last week after a 8.5% drop in the share price. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 33% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell DorianG, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
因此,當公司市值上週下跌8.5%,跌至11億美元后,機構投資者成爲受影響最嚴重的群體。可以想而知,最近的虧損進一步增加了股東一年來的33%的虧損,這對這類股東可能影響不佳。通常被稱爲"市場操縱者"的機構在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有重要影響力。因此,如果下跌趨勢持續,機構可能面臨賣出dorian lpg的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者產生負面影響。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about DorianG.
讓我們更仔細地觀察一下,從不同類型的股東那裏,我們能得出哪些關於doriang的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DorianG?
機構所有權告訴我們有關於DorianG的什麼信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
DorianG already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see DorianG's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
dorian lpg已經有機構在股東名冊上。確實,他們在公司擁有一定的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總是存在它們參與的'擁擠交易'的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會爭相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到dorian lpg的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更加複雜的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in DorianG. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.0% and 7.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO John Hadjipateras is the owner of 4.6% of the company's shares.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會對董事會的決定產生強烈影響。我們注意到對沖基金對DorianG的投資並不具有重要意義。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是黑石集團,持有12%的流通股。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的8.0%和7.0%。此外,首席執行官John Hadjipateras擁有公司股份的4.6%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記冊上看,13大股東控制了51%的股權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有這一股權的大多數利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of DorianG
Dorian LPG Ltd.的內部股東所有權情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can see that insiders own shares in Dorian LPG Ltd.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$79m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以看到內部人擁有dorian lpg有限公司的股份。這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性是件好事。內部人持有價值7,900萬美元的股份(按照當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部一致性問題,您可以點擊這裏查看內部人是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over DorianG. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
作爲擁有23%所有權的廣大公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Doriang有一定程度的影響力。儘管擁有的股權比例可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能無法改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that DorianG is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those doesn't sit too well with us...
我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,DorianG在我們的投資分析中顯示了2個警示信號,其中1個讓我們感到不太舒服…
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。