With 82% Ownership, The Clorox Company (NYSE:CLX) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 82% Ownership, The Clorox Company (NYSE:CLX) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Clorox's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 23 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 考慮到機構在該股票中持有的大部分股份,高樂氏的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前23個股東擁有公司50%的股份。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
A look at the shareholders of The Clorox Company (NYSE:CLX) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 82% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
觀察高樂氏公司(紐交所: CLX)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。 有82%的股份,機構在公司中持有最多的股份。 也就是說,如果股價上漲(或者出現下滑),該群體將受益最多(或者損失最大)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Clorox.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於高樂氏的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Clorox?
機構所有權告訴我們關於高樂氏的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Clorox already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Clorox, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
高樂氏在股東名冊上已經有了機構。事實上,他們擁有公司中很可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅憑這個事實來依賴,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查高樂氏的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Clorox is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 12%. With 8.8% and 6.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
投資者應該注意,實際上,機構擁有該公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體施加重大影響力。高樂氏不是對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是萬得富投資集團,持有12%的股份。分別持有8.8%和6.6%流通股的黑石集團公司和道富銀行全球貨幣顧問公司是第二和第三大股東。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 23 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更詳細的所有權數據顯示,前23大股東共擁有50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東佔多數。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of Clorox
高樂氏的內部股權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of The Clorox Company in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$31m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的數據顯示,高樂氏公司的內部持有人以自己的名義擁有不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此如果看到內部持有公司的較大比例將會令人吃驚。雖然他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值3100萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但也值得檢查這些內部持有人是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in Clorox. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在高樂氏公司持有18%的股份。儘管這一持有比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Clorox better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Clorox you should be aware of, and 1 of them makes us a bit uncomfortable.
考慮到持有公司股票的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解高樂氏,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如:我們發現高樂氏存在3個警示信號,您應該注意,其中1個讓我們有點不舒服。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。