share_log

Chemours (NYSE:CC) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky

Chemours (NYSE:CC) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky

Chemours (紐交所:CC) 使用債務可能被視爲風險較大。
Simply Wall St ·  11/22 19:14

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that The Chemours Company (NYSE:CC) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

傳奇基金經理李露(查理·芒格支持的人)曾說過:『最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久性資本損失。』 在你審視一家公司風險有多大時,自然會考慮公司的資產負債表,因爲企業崩潰時往往涉及到債務。我們注意到化工公司(紐交所:CC)確實在其資產負債表上有債務。但這債務對股東們來說是個問題嗎?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

債務可以幫助一家公司,直到公司難以償還,無論是通過新的資本還是通過自由現金流。如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以接管企業。雖然這種情況並不常見,但我們經常看到負債累累的公司因債權人迫使他們以低於市值的價格籌集資本而導致股東權益被稀釋。當然,很多公司使用債務來資助增長,沒有任何負面後果。在考慮一家企業使用多少債務時,第一件事是查看它的現金和債務。

How Much Debt Does Chemours Carry?

化工公司的債務有多少?

As you can see below, Chemours had US$3.99b of debt, at September 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had US$596.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$3.40b.

正如您在下面看到的,化工公司在2024年9月的債務爲39.9億美元,與前一年基本持平。您可以點擊圖表獲取更多細節。然而,它還有59600萬美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲34億美元。

big
NYSE:CC Debt to Equity History November 22nd 2024
紐交所:CC債務與股本歷史 2024年11月22日

How Strong Is Chemours' Balance Sheet?

Chemours的資產負債表有多強?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Chemours had liabilities of US$1.78b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$5.03b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$596.0m as well as receivables valued at US$951.0m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$5.26b.

從最近的資產負債表來看,Chemours在一年內到期的負債爲17.8億美元,以及超過這一時間到期的負債爲50.3億美元。爲了抵消這些負債,它擁有59600萬美元的現金以及在12個月內到期的應收賬款,價值95100萬美元。因此,它的負債超出其現金和(短期)應收款的總和52.6億美元。

The deficiency here weighs heavily on the US$2.88b company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. At the end of the day, Chemours would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.

這裏的不足嚴重影響了這家28.8億美元的公司,就像一個孩子揹着滿是書籍、體育器材和小號的沉重揹包一樣。因此,我們確實認爲股東需要密切關注這一點。最終,如果債權人要求償還,Chemours可能需要進行大規模的再融資。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我們通過查看淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比以及計算其利息支出由收益前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋的程度來度量一家公司的債務負載相對於其收益能力的程度。此方法的優點在於我們同時考慮了債務的絕對量(以淨債務爲EBITDA)以及與該債務相關的實際利息支出(以其利息覆蓋倍數計算)。

While Chemours's debt to EBITDA ratio (4.3) suggests that it uses some debt, its interest cover is very weak, at 1.9, suggesting high leverage. So shareholders should probably be aware that interest expenses appear to have really impacted the business lately. Investors should also be troubled by the fact that Chemours saw its EBIT drop by 15% over the last twelve months. If that's the way things keep going handling the debt load will be like delivering hot coffees on a pogo stick. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Chemours's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

儘管Chemours的債務與EBITDA的比率爲4.3,表明它使用了一些債務,但其利息覆蓋率非常低,僅爲1.9,這表明槓桿率很高。因此,股東應該意識到,利息支出似乎最近真的影響了業務。投資者還應該對Chemours在過去12個月內EBIT下降15%的事實感到擔憂。如果這種情況持續下去,那麼承受債務負擔就像在蹦牀上送熱咖啡一樣毫無疑問。我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識是最多的。但未來的收益,尤其是將決定Chemours在未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你專注於未來,可以查看這份免費的報告,展示分析師的利潤預測。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, Chemours recorded negative free cash flow, in total. Debt is usually more expensive, and almost always more risky in the hands of a company with negative free cash flow. Shareholders ought to hope for an improvement.

最後,雖然稅務部門可能喜愛會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冷硬的現金。 所以我們顯然需要看看EBIT是否帶來了相應的自由現金流。 在過去三年中,the chemours記錄了負的自由現金流,總額爲負值。 債務通常更昂貴,並且在擁有負自由現金流的公司手中幾乎總是更具風險。 股東們應該希望有所改善。

Our View

我們的觀點

On the face of it, Chemours's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow left us tentative about the stock, and its level of total liabilities was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. And even its EBIT growth rate fails to inspire much confidence. Considering all the factors previously mentioned, we think that Chemours really is carrying too much debt. To our minds, that means the stock is rather high risk, and probably one to avoid; but to each their own (investing) style. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Chemours is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those are significant...

從表面上看,the chemours將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流使我們對股票持觀望態度,其總負債水平並不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚那家空餐館更具吸引力。 甚至其EBIT增長率也未能激發太多信心。 考慮到之前提到的所有因素,我們認爲the chemours實際上揹負了過多的債務。 在我們看來,這意味着該股票風險相對較高,可能應該避免;但每個人的投資風格各有不同。 在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是一個開始的地方。 但最終,每家公司都可能存在在資產負債表之外的風險。 請注意,the chemours在我們的投資分析中顯示出3個警告信號,其中2個是顯著的...

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果在所有這些之後,您更感興趣的是具有堅實資產負債表的快速增長公司,那麼不要拖延,查看我們的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論