The Collective Beneficial Owners Of ~43% Of The Issued And Outstanding Shares Of Greenfire Resources And Greenfire's Largest Shareholder, Announce That They Have Requisitioned A Special Meeting Of Holders Of Common Shares For The Purpose Of Replacing...
The Collective Beneficial Owners Of ~43% Of The Issued And Outstanding Shares Of Greenfire Resources And Greenfire's Largest Shareholder, Announce That They Have Requisitioned A Special Meeting Of Holders Of Common Shares For The Purpose Of Replacing...
WEF is requesting that the Board call a meeting of Greenfire shareholders to replace the current Board of four with six highly-qualified directors (the "The Collective Beneficial Owners Of ~43% Of The Issued And Outstanding Shares Of Greenfire Resources And Greenfire's Largest Shareholder, Announce That They Have Requisitioned A Special Meeting Of Holders Of Common Shares For The Purpose Of Replacing The Current Board Of Directors
Greenfire Resources約43％的已發行和流通股份的集體受益所有人和Greenfire的最大股東宣佈，他們已徵用普通股持有人特別會議，以取代現任董事會
Summary
摘要
In summary, it has become clear that the current Greenfire Board, in the face of poor operational performance, a declining share price and blatant self-dealing, has resorted to desperate corporate lawfare maneuvers to entrench themselves despite overwhelming evidence that their shareholders and the market has lost confidence in them.
總而言之，顯而易見，面對運營業績不佳、股價下跌和公然的自我交易，儘管有大量證據表明其股東和市場對他們失去了信心，但當前的Greenfire董事會還是採取了絕望的公司法手段來鞏固自己的地位。
Fortunately, Greenfire shareholders have another option. WEF was attracted to Greenfire likely for the same reason as many of its fellow shareholders: Greenfire owns a high-quality asset, but the company's value is currently clouded by mismanagement and a dysfunctional Board. WEF has a track record of creating value by simplifying complex corporate situations so that the underlying value of the assets can shine through, and it is confident it can once again do so with Greenfire.
幸運的是，Greenfire的股東還有另一種選擇。世界經濟論壇被Greenfire吸引的原因可能與許多其他股東相同：Greenfire擁有高質量的資產，但該公司的價值目前因管理不善和董事會功能失調而蒙上陰影。WEF在通過簡化複雜的公司情況來創造價值方面有着良好的記錄，從而使資產的潛在價值得以發揮，它有信心通過Greenfire再次實現這一目標。
WEF is requesting that the Board call a meeting of Greenfire shareholders to replace the current Board of four with six highly-qualified directors (the "Shareholder Nominees") who bring significant oil and gas, operational, public company, capital markets, mergers and acquisitions and financial experience. WEF requests that the Meeting be held promptly, and in any event by no later than January 2025.
世界經濟論壇要求董事會召開Greenfire股東會議，用六名具有豐富石油和天然氣、運營、上市公司、資本市場、併購和財務經驗的高素質董事（「股東候選人」）取代目前的四人董事會。世界經濟論壇要求立即舉行會議，無論如何不遲於2025年1月。
Finally, contrary to Greenfire's baseless claims in its November 20, 2024 press release, WEF has no intention of proposing a combination of Greenfire and Strathcona at this time. Furthermore, even if it did, shareholders should rest assured that any such transaction would be subject to the approval of the majority of disinterested (i.e. non-WEF) shareholders (at both Greenfire and Strathcona), under Multilateral Instrument 61-101 - Protections for Minority Shareholders. Moreover, contrary to Greenfire's claims, all six of WEF's nominees are considered independent under applicable securities laws.
最後，與Greenfire在其2024年11月20日的新聞稿中毫無根據的說法相反，世界經濟論壇目前無意提議將Greenfire和Strathcona合併。此外，即使如此，股東也應放心，根據第61-101號多邊文書 「保護少數股東」，任何此類交易都必須得到大多數不感興趣（即非世界經濟論壇）股東（Greenfire和Strathcona）的批准。此外，與Greenfire的說法相反，根據適用的證券法，世界經濟論壇的所有六位被提名人均被視爲獨立人士。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。
