With 63% Institutional Ownership, Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 63% Institutional Ownership, Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Bank of America's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 48% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 鑑於機構在股票中持有的巨大股份,美國銀行的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 共有25位投資者擁有這家公司48%的所有權。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
A look at the shareholders of Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 63% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看美國銀行公司(NYSE:BAC)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。機構以63%的股份在公司的股份中佔據最多。這意味着,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最大利益(如果下跌則損失最多)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構具有龐大的資本量,他們的市場動作往往會受到零售或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,在一家公司中擁有大量機構投資往往被視爲一個理想的特徵。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Bank of America.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於美國銀行的事情。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bank of America?
機構持股情況能告訴我們有關美國銀行的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Bank of America does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Bank of America's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到美國銀行確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽。然而,最好要謹慎依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。如果多個機構同時對某隻股票改變看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,看看美國銀行的營業收入歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Bank of America. Our data shows that Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is the largest shareholder with 10.0% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.6% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 6.2% of the company stock.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會對董事會決策產生較強的影響。我們注意到對美國銀行而言,對沖基金並沒有進行重大投資。我們的數據顯示,伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司是最大股東,持有10.0%的流通股份。先鋒集團是第二大股東,持有8.6%的普通股,而貝萊德公司持有約6.2%的公司股票。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Bank of America
美國銀行內部人員的所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that Bank of America Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$509m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,美國銀行公司的內部人員擁有不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,所以如果內部人員擁有公司大比例的股份將會讓人驚訝。儘管他們的持有量低於1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值50900萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通大衆——包括零售投資者——擁有該公司的26%股份,因此不容易被忽視。雖然擁有規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東的決策不一致,可能無法改變公司政策。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 10.0% of the Bank of America shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我們可以看到,上市公司持有10.0%的美國銀行已發行股份。我們不能確定,但這很可能是一個戰略性持股。這些企業可能相似,或者合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Bank of America , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我發現了解誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如說,始終存在的投資風險的陰影。我們已識別出美國銀行的1個警告信號,理解這些應成爲您投資過程的一部分。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。