Has Electronic Arts Inc.'s (NASDAQ:EA) Impressive Stock Performance Got Anything to Do With Its Fundamentals?
Has Electronic Arts Inc.'s (NASDAQ:EA) Impressive Stock Performance Got Anything to Do With Its Fundamentals?
Electronic Arts' (NASDAQ:EA) stock is up by a considerable 14% over the past month. Given that stock prices are usually aligned with a company's financial performance in the long-term, we decided to study its financial indicators more closely to see if they had a hand to play in the recent price move. Particularly, we will be paying attention to Electronic Arts' ROE today.
電子藝術(納斯達克:EA)的股票在過去一個月上漲了14%。考慮到股票價格通常與公司長期的財務表現相關,因此我們決定更仔細地研究其財務指標,以查看它們是否在最近的價格變動中發揮了作用。特別是,我們今天將關注電子藝術的roe。
ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.
roe或股東權益回報率是評估公司如何有效地從股東那裏獲得回報的有用工具。簡而言之,它用於評估公司相對於其權益資本的盈利能力。
How Is ROE Calculated?
淨資產收益率怎麼計算?
Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula:
股東權益報酬率可以使用以下公式計算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營) ÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Electronic Arts is:
因此,根據上述公式,電子藝術的roe爲:
14% = US$1.0b ÷ US$7.4b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
14% = 10億美元 ÷ 74億美元(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.14 in profit.
『回報』是指過去十二個月的稅後盈利。換句話說,對於每1美元的淨資產,公司能夠賺取0.14美元的利潤。
Why Is ROE Important For Earnings Growth?
ROE爲什麼對淨利潤增長很重要?
We have already established that ROE serves as an efficient profit-generating gauge for a company's future earnings. Depending on how much of these profits the company reinvests or "retains", and how effectively it does so, we are then able to assess a company's earnings growth potential. Assuming all else is equal, companies that have both a higher return on equity and higher profit retention are usually the ones that have a higher growth rate when compared to companies that don't have the same features.
我們已經確定ROE服務於衡量一個公司未來收益的效率指標。根據公司再投資或「保留」的這些利潤的多少以及效果,我們便能夠評估一個公司的收益增長潛力。假設其他條件均相等,則ROE和利潤保留率均較高的公司通常比那些沒有同樣特徵的公司具有更高的增長速度。
Electronic Arts' Earnings Growth And 14% ROE
電子藝術公司的收益增長及14%的ROE
At first glance, Electronic Arts seems to have a decent ROE. And on comparing with the industry, we found that the the average industry ROE is similar at 14%. However, while Electronic Arts has a pretty respectable ROE, its five year net income decline rate was 22% . We reckon that there could be some other factors at play here that are preventing the company's growth. These include low earnings retention or poor allocation of capital.
乍一看,電子藝術公司的ROE似乎還不錯。與行業進行比較後,我們發現行業的平均ROE也在14%左右。然而,儘管電子藝術公司有一個相當可觀的ROE,但其五年淨利潤下降率高達22%。我們認爲,這裏可能存在一些其他因素在阻礙公司的增長。這些因素包括低收益保留或資本分配不當。
So, as a next step, we compared Electronic Arts' performance against the industry and were disappointed to discover that while the company has been shrinking its earnings, the industry has been growing its earnings at a rate of 25% over the last few years.
因此,作爲下一步,我們將電子藝術公司的表現與行業進行比較,失望地發現雖然該公司的收益在萎縮,但行業在過去幾年中的收益增長率達到了25%。
Earnings growth is an important metric to consider when valuing a stock. The investor should try to establish if the expected growth or decline in earnings, whichever the case may be, is priced in. This then helps them determine if the stock is placed for a bright or bleak future. Has the market priced in the future outlook for EA? You can find out in our latest intrinsic value infographic research report.
盈利增長是評估股票時需要考慮的重要指標。投資者應該嘗試判斷預期的盈利增長或下降,無論哪種情況,是否已經被市場定價。這將幫助他們判斷該股票未來是光明還是黯淡。市場是否已經考慮了 EA 的未來前景?您可以在我們最新的內在價值信息圖表研究報告中找到答案。
Is Electronic Arts Using Its Retained Earnings Effectively?
電子藝術公司是否有效地使用其留存收益?
When we piece together Electronic Arts' low three-year median payout ratio of 22% (where it is retaining 78% of its profits), calculated for the last three-year period, we are puzzled by the lack of growth. This typically shouldn't be the case when a company is retaining most of its earnings. So there could be some other explanations in that regard. For example, the company's business may be deteriorating.
當我們將電子藝術公司過去三年平均22%的低分紅派息比率(其中保留了78%的利潤)拼湊在一起時,我們對缺乏增長感到困惑。當一家公司保留大部分盈利時,通常不應該出現這種情況。因此,可能還有其他解釋。例如,該公司的業務可能正在惡化。
Moreover, Electronic Arts has been paying dividends for four years, which is a considerable amount of time, suggesting that management must have perceived that the shareholders prefer consistent dividends even though earnings have been shrinking. Existing analyst estimates suggest that the company's future payout ratio is expected to drop to 8.8% over the next three years. The fact that the company's ROE is expected to rise to 25% over the same period is explained by the drop in the payout ratio.
此外,電子藝術公司已經連續四年支付分紅,這是一段相當長的時間,表明管理層必須意識到股東更喜歡穩定的分紅,儘管盈利在減少。現有的分析師預計該公司的未來分紅派息比率將在接下來的三年內下降至8.8%。公司roe預計將在同一期間上升至25%,這一事實可以通過分紅派息比率的下降來解釋。
Summary
總結
On the whole, we do feel that Electronic Arts has some positive attributes. However, given the high ROE and high profit retention, we would expect the company to be delivering strong earnings growth, but that isn't the case here. This suggests that there might be some external threat to the business, that's hampering its growth. With that said, we studied the latest analyst forecasts and found that while the company has shrunk its earnings in the past, analysts expect its earnings to grow in the future. To know more about the latest analysts predictions for the company, check out this visualization of analyst forecasts for the company.
總體來說,我們確實認爲電子藝術公司有一些積極的特點。 然而,考慮到其高roe和高利潤留存,我們本應期待該公司實現強勁的盈利增長,但事實並非如此。這表明可能存在一些外部威脅影響了其業務的增長。 話雖如此,我們研究了最新的分析師預測,發現儘管該公司過去的盈利有所下降,但分析師預計其未來的盈利將會增長。 要了解更多關於該公司的最新分析師預測,請查看該公司的分析師預測可視化。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。