SharkNinja (NYSE:SN) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
SharkNinja (NYSE:SN) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We note that SharkNinja, Inc. (NYSE:SN) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
霍華德·馬克斯很好地表達了觀點,他說,與其擔心股票價格的波動,不如擔心「永久損失的可能性是我所擔心的風險……而我所知道的每一個實際投資者也都在擔心。」因此,當你考慮任何給定股票的風險時,考慮債務可能是顯而易見的,因爲過多的債務會使公司陷入困境。我們注意到SharkNinja公司(紐交所代碼:SN)確實在其資產負債表上有債務。但是,這項債務對股東而言是個問題嗎?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
當企業無法輕鬆履行債務,無論是通過自由現金流還是以有吸引力的價格籌集資本,債務和其他負債都會對企業造成風險。 最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能什麼都得不到。 然而,更頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是公司必須以低價發行股票,永久稀釋股東的權益,以強化其資產負債表。 當然,很多公司使用債務進行增長融資,並沒有產生任何負面後果。 當我們評估債務水平時,首先要考慮現金和債務的總體情況。
What Is SharkNinja's Net Debt?
SharkNinja的淨債務是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 SharkNinja had US$960.3m of debt, an increase on US$804.6m, over one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$127.9m, its net debt is less, at about US$832.4m.
你可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但它顯示到2024年9月,SharkNinja的債務爲96030萬美元,比去年的80460萬美元有所增加。然而,由於其有12790萬美元的現金儲備,其淨債務更少,約爲83240萬美元。
How Strong Is SharkNinja's Balance Sheet?
SharkNinja的資產負債表有多強?
According to the last reported balance sheet, SharkNinja had liabilities of US$1.51b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$932.6m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$127.9m as well as receivables valued at US$1.19b due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$1.12b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
根據最新報告的資產負債表,SharkNinja有15.1億美元在12個月內到期的負債,以及在12個月後到期的93260萬美元負債。抵消這些義務的是12790萬美元的現金以及到期於12個月內的11.9億美元應收賬款。所以其負債總額比現金和短期應收款的總和多出11.2億美元。
Since publicly traded SharkNinja shares are worth a very impressive total of US$13.9b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.
由於公開交易的SharkNinja股票總值達到139億美元,因此這個負債水平似乎不太可能構成重大威脅。但負債仍然足夠多,我們當然建議股東繼續關注資產負債表,以便做好未來的準備。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
爲了衡量公司債務相對於其收入的規模,我們計算其淨債務除以利息、稅收、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),並計算其利息前稅利潤(EBIT)除以利息支出(其利息覆蓋率)。這樣,我們考慮了債務的絕對金額,以及支付的利率。
With net debt sitting at just 1.3 times EBITDA, SharkNinja is arguably pretty conservatively geared. And it boasts interest cover of 8.6 times, which is more than adequate. In addition to that, we're happy to report that SharkNinja has boosted its EBIT by 65%, thus reducing the spectre of future debt repayments. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine SharkNinja's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
SharkNinja的淨債務僅爲EBITDA的1.3倍,堪稱相當保守。而且它的利息覆蓋率爲8.6倍,這已經非常充足。此外,我們很高興地報告,SharkNinja的EBIT提高了65%,從而減少了未來債務償還的壓力。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是重點。但更重要的是未來的收益,這將判斷SharkNinja在未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的看法,可能會覺得這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, SharkNinja recorded free cash flow of 22% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
最後,一家公司只能用實際現金償還債務,而不是賬面利潤。所以我們總是檢查有多少EBIT轉化爲自由現金流。從最近三年的數據來看,SharkNinja的自由現金流佔EBIT的22%,這比我們預期的要弱。這在償還債務時並不理想。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, SharkNinja's impressive EBIT growth rate implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But truth be told we feel its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow does undermine this impression a bit. When we consider the range of factors above, it looks like SharkNinja is pretty sensible with its use of debt. That means they are taking on a bit more risk, in the hope of boosting shareholder returns. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 1 warning sign with SharkNinja , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
值得慶幸的是,SharkNinja的EBIT增長率表明它在債務方面具有優勢。但說實話,我們認爲其EBIT向自由現金流的轉換使這一印象稍微減弱。當我們考慮上述各因素時,SharkNinja在債務使用上顯得相當合理。這意味着他們在承擔更多風險,以期提升股東回報。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的重點。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表之外的風險。我們已識別出SharkNinja的1個警告信號,理解這些信號應成爲您投資過程的一部分。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。