share_log

We Think On Holding's (NYSE:ONON) Profit Is Only A Baseline For What They Can Achieve

We Think On Holding's (NYSE:ONON) Profit Is Only A Baseline For What They Can Achieve

我們認爲Holding's(紐交所:ONON)的利潤只是他們可以實現的基準。
Simply Wall St ·  11/20 19:01

Even though On Holding AG's (NYSE:ONON) recent earnings release was robust, the market didn't seem to notice. Our analysis suggests that investors might be missing some promising details.

儘管On Holding AG(紐交所:ONON)最近的收入發佈表現強勁,但市場似乎沒有注意到。我們的分析表明,投資者可能會錯過一些有前途的細節。

big
NYSE:ONON Earnings and Revenue History November 20th 2024
紐交所:ONON收益和營業收入歷史數據2024年11月20日

A Closer Look At On Holding's Earnings

仔細觀察On Holding的收益

As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

正如財務迷們已經知道的那樣,現金流的應計比率是評估公司自由現金流(FCF)與利潤匹配程度的重要指標。爲了獲得應計比率,我們首先減去一段時間的FCF和利潤,然後將該數字除以該期間的平均營運資產。該比率顯示了公司的利潤超過其FCF的多少。

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

因此,負的應計比率對公司來說是積極的,而正的應計比率則是消極的。雖然應計比率高於零並不值得擔心,但當公司有相對較高的應計比率時,我們認爲這值得注意。引用Lewellen和Resutek 2014年的一篇論文:「應計比率較高的公司未來往往利潤較低」。

For the year to September 2024, On Holding had an accrual ratio of -0.49. Therefore, its statutory earnings were very significantly less than its free cashflow. To wit, it produced free cash flow of CHF400m during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of CHF126.0m. Given that On Holding had negative free cash flow in the prior corresponding period, the trailing twelve month resul of CHF400m would seem to be a step in the right direction.

截至2024年9月,On Holding的計提比率爲-0.49。因此,其法定收益明顯低於自由現金流。在這一時期,它產生了CHF40000萬的自由現金流,遠遠超過其CHF12600萬的報告利潤。鑑於On Holding在前一對應期間的自由現金流爲負,CHF40000萬的去年滾動12個月結果似乎是朝着正確方向邁出的一步。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。

Our Take On On Holding's Profit Performance

我們對On Holding的盈利表現有所看法。

Happily for shareholders, On Holding produced plenty of free cash flow to back up its statutory profit numbers. Based on this observation, we consider it possible that On Holding's statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! And the EPS is up 56% over the last twelve months. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. Obviously, we love to consider the historical data to inform our opinion of a company. But it can be really valuable to consider what other analysts are forecasting. At Simply Wall St, we have analyst estimates which you can view by clicking here.

對股東來說,On Holding產生了大量的自由現金流,以支持其法定利潤數字。基於這一觀察結果,我們認爲On Holding的法定利潤實際上低估了其盈利潛力!每股收益在過去十二個月內增長了56%。最終,如果想要正確了解公司,除了上述因素之外,還必須考慮更多內容是至關重要的。顯然,我們喜歡考慮歷史數據來影響我們對公司的看法。但考慮其他分析師的預測也可以提供非常有價值的信息。在Simply Wall St,我們有分析師的預估數據,您可以點擊這裏查看。

Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of On Holding's profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

今天,我們將重點放在一個特定數據點上,以更好地了解On Holding的盈利性質。但如果您能集中精力關注細節,就會發現更多。一些人認爲高股本回報率是一個優質企業的良好跡象。因此,您可能希望查看這些有高股本回報率的公司的自由收集,或者這些具有高內部所有權的股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論