Institutional Investors in Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ:CNDT) See US$59m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Institutional Investors in Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ:CNDT) See US$59m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Conduent's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 顯著較高的機構持有意味着Conduent的股票價格對它們的交易行爲敏感。
- 總共有11家投資者擁有該公司52%的所有權
- 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ:CNDT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 73% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制了Conduent Incorporated (納斯達克:CNDT),理解其業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約73%,是機構。換句話說,這群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$59m last week. However, the 34% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
機構投資者在公司市值上週下降了5900萬美元后遭受了最大的損失。然而,34%的年回報率可能幫助減輕了他們的整體損失。不過,他們應該留意未來可能出現的進一步損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Conduent.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於conduent的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Conduent?
機構持股情況告訴我們關於conduent的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Conduent does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Conduent's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到conduent確實有機構投資者,他們持有相當一部分公司的股票。這可以表明,該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽。然而,最好對依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持謹慎。他們有時也會出錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得關注一下conduent的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Conduent. Our data shows that Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC is the largest shareholder with 9.4% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.2% and 7.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Clifford Skelton, the CEO has 2.5% of the shares allocated to their name.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對conduent的對沖基金並沒有明顯的投資。我們的數據顯示Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC是最大的股東,持有9.4%的流通股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有8.2%和7.9%的流通股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官Clifford Skelton持有2.5%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記冊,我們可以看到11個頭寸最大的股東控制着52%的所有權,這意味着沒有單個股東擁有的權益超過了多數權益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化學技術股份有限公司的內部人員擁有重要比例,內部人員在這家總價值27億人民幣的公司中持有12億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否進行了買賣。
Insider Ownership Of Conduent
conduent的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Conduent Incorporated. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$53m worth of the US$627m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
股東們可能會對內部人士擁有Conduent Incorporated的股份感興趣。作爲個人,內部人士集體擁有價值5300萬美元的股份,在公司總價值62700萬美元中佔有一部分。這至少顯示出一定的對齊。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出的情況。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Conduent. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Conduent 19%的股份。雖然這樣的股份規模可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Conduent is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,在我們的投資分析中,conduent顯示出兩個警告信號,您應該知道……
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。