DTE Energy Company (NYSE:DTE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 78% of the Company
DTE Energy Company (NYSE:DTE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 78% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, DTE Energy's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 考慮到機構在股票中所持有的大部分股份,dte能源的股價可能會受到它們交易決策的影響。
- 共有13位投資者持有該公司51%的所有權。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
Every investor in DTE Energy Company (NYSE:DTE) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 78% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
紐交所:dte能源公司(NYSE:DTE)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。機構佔有78%的股份,在公司中擁有最大的股份。換句話說,該群體最有可能從對該公司的投資中獲利(或蒙受最大損失)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about DTE Energy.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關dte能源的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DTE Energy?
機構所有權告訴我們關於dte能源的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in DTE Energy. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see DTE Energy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在dte能源中擁有相當大的股份。 這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的聲譽。 但是,最好警惕依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。 他們有時也會出錯。 當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在一種風險,即他們參與了一種「擁擠的交易」。 當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。 這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。 您可以在下面看到dte能源的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住事情總會更復雜。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. DTE Energy is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 8.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Capital Research and Management Company and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
投資者應該注意,實際上機構擁有該公司超過一半的股份,因此他們集體可以行使重要的影響力。dte能源不是由對沖基金擁有的。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是該公司最大的股東,持有12%的流通股。分別持有11%和8.2%的流通股,Capital Research and Management Company和BlackRock, Inc.是第二和第三大股東。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記冊上看,13大股東控制了51%的股權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有這一股權的大多數利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of DTE Energy
dte能源的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of DTE Energy Company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$73m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,dte能源公司的內部持有少於1%的股份。由於這是一家大公司,我們只能期望內部人員持有很小比例的股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值7300萬美元的股份。至少有一定比例的內部持股總是令人高興的,但也值得注意的是,可能值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在拋售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 22% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over DTE Energy. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
作爲一家22%的股東,主要是由個人投資者組成的普通大衆在dte能源公司擁有一定的影響力。雖然這種持股比例相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for DTE Energy you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。例如:我們發現dte能源存在2個警示信號,你應該注意,其中1個有點不愉快。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。