Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as C3.ai, Inc.'s (NYSE:AI) Recent US$199m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as C3.ai, Inc.'s (NYSE:AI) Recent US$199m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in C3.ai implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 48% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders own 12% of C3.ai
- 機構在c3.ai的持股比例相當可觀,意味着他們對公司股價有着顯著的影響力
- 前25名股東持有48%的業務。
- 內部人士持有c3.ai 12%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 46% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制着c3.ai,Inc. (紐交所:AI),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的一群人是機構,持有46%的股份。換句話說,這個群體在投資該公司的過程中最有可能獲得最大收益(或承擔最大損失)。
As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$199m. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 11% for shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell C3.ai which might hurt individual investors.
因此,機構投資者在上週遭遇了最大的損失,市值下降了19,900萬美元。這類投資者可能尤其關注當前的損失,這使得股東一年的損失達到了11%。機構或「流動性提供者」控制着大量資金,因此這些類型的投資者通常對股票價格變動具有很大的影響力。因此,如果這一下降趨勢持續,機構投資者可能會被迫賣出c3.ai,這可能會傷害到個人投資者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of C3.ai.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了c3.ai的不同持有者群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About C3.ai?
機構所有權對C3.ai有什麼啓示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that C3.ai does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see C3.ai's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到c3.ai確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有公司不少股票。這表明在專業投資者中存在一定的信譽。但我們不能僅靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們在一種「擁擠的交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方可能會競爭快速出售股票。這一風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到c3.ai的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是有更多的內幕。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in C3.ai. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.8% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.5% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Thomas Siebel, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
我們注意到,對c3.ai的對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是先鋒集團(The Vanguard Group, Inc.),持有9.8%的流通股。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有8.5%和5.9%的流通股。第二大股東托馬斯·西貝爾(Thomas Siebel)恰好還擔任首席執行官的職務。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of C3.ai
C3.ai的內幕持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of C3.ai, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$380m stake in this US$3.3b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有c3.ai, Inc.相當比例的股份。很有趣的是,內部人士在這個33億美金的業務中擁有38000萬美元的重要股份。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們並肩投資。您可能想查看這個免費的圖表,展示內部人士最近的交易情況。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 41% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over C3.ai. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆擁有41%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,他們對c3.ai有一定的影響力。雖然這種規模的持股可能不足以左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with C3.ai .
雖然考慮擁有一個公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲了這一點,您應該意識到我們發現的c3.ai的兩個警告信號。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。