With 5.3% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Ambarella, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AMBA) 7.7% Stock Price Decline
With 5.3% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Ambarella, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AMBA) 7.7% Stock Price Decline
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Ambarella's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
- Recent sales by insiders
- 考慮到機構在股票中持有大量股份,安霸的股價可能會受到它們的交易決策的影響
- 業務的51%由前15名股東持有。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
If you want to know who really controls Ambarella, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMBA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果想了解真正控制安霸公司(納斯達克:AMBA)的是誰,那麼你需要看看其股東登記冊的構成。機構持有83%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群體。也就是說,如果股價上漲,這個群體將獲益最多(如果發生下跌,則損失最大)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$196m last week. However, the 5.3% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
機構投資者在上週公司市值減少了19600萬美元后遭受了最高的損失。然而,一年5.3%的回報率可能有助於緩解他們的整體損失。然而,我們會假設他們將密切關注未來的弱勢。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ambarella, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究安霸每種所有者的情況,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ambarella?
機構持股告訴我們有關安霸的什麼信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Ambarella already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ambarella, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
安霸的股東名冊上已經有機構。實際上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經查看了股票並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯。如果兩位大型機構投資者同時嘗試賣出一支股票,則看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查安霸的過去盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Ambarella is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.4% and 4.7% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Feng-Ming Wang is the owner of 1.8% of the company's shares.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過公司一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要影響力。 安霸不是對沖基金所有。 該公司最大的股東是領先集團,擁有11%的股權。 相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.4%和4.7%的股份。 此外,CEO王豐明擁有該公司1.8%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
所有者們擁有Compass Diversified 33%的股份,其中主要由個人投資者組成,對Compass Diversified產生了一定的影響。雖然該所有權規模可能不足以在他們的利益之下影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Ambarella
安霸的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
We can see that insiders own shares in Ambarella, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$139m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以看到,內部股東擁有安霸公司的股份。 這是一家大公司,因此看到這種程度的一致性是好事。內部股東擁有價值13900萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會認爲這顯示了股東和董事會之間的利益一致性。儘管如此,值得檢查一下這些內部股東是否一直在拋售股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
廣大公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司中擁有11%的持股,因此不能被輕視。雖然這個群體不能決定掌控權,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Ambarella is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
我覺得查看公司的股東是非常有趣的。但要真正獲得深入了解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,在我們的投資分析中,安霸顯示出了3個警告信號,你應該知道...
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。