Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 86% of the Company
Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 86% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Stifel Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構在stifel financial的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價有重大影響
- 14位最大股東持有該業務的51%。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着Stifel Financial Corp. (紐交所:SF),重要的是要了解業務的所有權結構。我們可以看到機構擁有公司86%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Stifel Financial.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關stifel financial的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stifel Financial?
機構所有權信息對stifel financial有何啓示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Stifel Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Stifel Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
stifel financial已經有機構出現在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司擁有一定比例的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區具有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會判斷錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得關注stifel financial以下的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Stifel Financial is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.0% and 6.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Ronald Kruszewski directly holds 1.3% of the total shares outstanding.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。stifel financial 不是對沖基金所持有。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group, Inc. 是最大的股東,持有10%的流通股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股份的9.0%和6.5%。此外,公司CEO Ronald Kruszewski 直接持有流通股份的1.3%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 14 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記簿中可以看出,51%的股權由前14名股東控制,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Stifel Financial
stifel financial 的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Stifel Financial Corp.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$407m. Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,Stifel Financial Corp.的內部持有一些股份。內部持有者持有價值40700萬美元的股份。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間存在良好的利益一致性。不過,檢查一下這些內部持有者是否在賣出股份可能是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Stifel Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在Stifel Financial持有10%的股份。雖然這一群體可能無法左右公司的決策,但確實可以對公司的經營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Stifel Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Stifel Financial has 3 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.
始終值得思考不同的股東群體。但要更好地了解stifel financial,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。拿風險舉例 - stifel financial有3個警示信號(其中1個不容忽視)我們認爲您應該了解。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。