share_log

TSS, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSSI) Surges 33%; Individual Investors Who Own 55% Shares Profited Along With Insiders

TSS, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSSI) Surges 33%; Individual Investors Who Own 55% Shares Profited Along With Insiders

TSS公司 (納斯達克股票代碼:TSSI) 暴漲33%; 擁有55%股份的個人投資者和內部人士一起獲利
Simply Wall St ·  11/15 23:19

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in TSS indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 12 shareholders own 45% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 個人投資者在TSS持有相當大的股權,這表明他們在管理和業務策略方面有更大的發言權
  • 前12大股東擁有公司45%的股份
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

If you want to know who really controls TSS, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSSI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 55% to be precise, is individual investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道誰真正控制着TSS, Inc. (納斯達克代碼:TSSI),那麼您需要查看其股東登記冊的構成。持有公司最多股數的組別,準確地說是約55%的個人投資者。換句話說,該組別最有可能(或最有可能)從自己投資到公司中獲得最多回報(或損失最大)。

Following a 33% increase in the stock price last week, individual investors profited the most, but insiders who own 32% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

上週股價上漲33%,個人投資者獲利最多,但持有32%股票的內部人員也有望從此次增長中獲益。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of TSS.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大查看了TSS的不同所有權群體。

big
NasdaqCM:TSSI Ownership Breakdown November 15th 2024
NasdaqCM:TSSI所有權拆分2024年11月15日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TSS?

沒有機構持有權益意味着什麼?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構不擁有股票的原因有多種解釋。最常見的是公司相對於管理基金過小,因此機構不必仔細審查公司。也有可能是基金經理人不持有股票,因爲他們不確信該股票表現良好。機構投資者可能並不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的過去營業收入表現。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of TSS, for yourself, below.

公司沒有機構持有股份可能有各種原因。通常,小型、新上市公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理無法在公司建立有意義的頭寸。 也可能是基金經理之所以不持有該股票,是因爲他們並不認爲它會表現良好。機構投資者可能認爲該公司的歷史增長不盡人意,或者可能存在其他因素。 您可以自行查看TSS的過去營業收入表現。

big
NasdaqCM:TSSI Earnings and Revenue Growth November 15th 2024
納斯達克CM:TSSI盈利和營業收入增長2024年11月15日

It would appear that 13% of TSS shares are controlled by hedge funds. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that MHW Capital Management, LLC is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.3% and 6.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Darryll Dewan is the owner of 1.2% of the company's shares.

看起來TSS股票中有13%由對沖基金控制。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者引發改變以爲股東創造近期價值。我們的數據顯示,MHW Capital Management, LLC是擁有13%流通股的最大股東。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的8.3%和6.6%。此外,CEO Darryll Dewan擁有公司股份的1.2%。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 12 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前12大股東集體持有不到註冊股份的一半,這表明有一大群小股東,沒有任何一家股東佔多數。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

儘管研究一家公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增添價值,但研究分析師建議以深入了解股票的預期表現也是一個好的做法。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此可能爲人所知甚少。

Insider Ownership Of TSS

TSS內部股權所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of TSS, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$291m, and insiders have US$93m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

TSS,Inc.似乎有相當比例的內部人持有。其市值僅爲29100萬美元,內部人員名下的股份價值爲9300萬美元。我們認爲這表明與股東利益保持一致,但值得注意的是公司規模仍然相當小;一些內部人員可能是公司的創始人。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 55% of TSS shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,共同持有TSS股票的55%。憑藉這一所有權,散戶投資者可以共同在影響股東回報的決策中發揮作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他們還可以行使投票權,對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併進行投票。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for TSS that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。例如,在這裏投資之前,我們發現了TSS的3個警示信號,你應該注意。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論