FIGS' (NYSE:FIGS) Soft Earnings Are Actually Better Than They Appear
FIGS' (NYSE:FIGS) Soft Earnings Are Actually Better Than They Appear
The most recent earnings report from FIGS, Inc. (NYSE:FIGS) was disappointing for shareholders. However, our analysis suggests that the soft headline numbers are getting counterbalanced by some positive underlying factors.
FIGS公司(紐交所:FIGS)最近的業績讓股東感到失望。然而,我們的分析表明,疲軟的表面數據被一些積極的基本因素所抵消。
A Closer Look At FIGS' Earnings
仔細看看FIGS的每股收益
One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.
衡量公司將其利潤轉化爲自由現金流(FCF)的一個重要財務比率是應計比率。 應計比率將FCF從給定時期的利潤中減去,並將結果除以公司在該期間的平均運營資產。 您可以將非自由現金流獲利比率視爲從現金流中提取的應計比率。
That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth.
這意味着負的應計比率是一件好事,因爲它表明公司帶來的自由現金流比其利潤所顯示的更多。雖然擁有正的應計比率並不是問題,表明一定程度的非現金利潤,但高應計比率可能是一件壞事,因爲這表明紙面利潤不能得到現金流支持。這是因爲一些學術研究表明,高應計比率往往導致較低的利潤或利潤增長率。
Over the twelve months to September 2024, FIGS recorded an accrual ratio of -0.33. Therefore, its statutory earnings were very significantly less than its free cashflow. In fact, it had free cash flow of US$51m in the last year, which was a lot more than its statutory profit of US$10.8m. FIGS' free cash flow actually declined over the last year, which is disappointing, like non-biodegradable balloons.
截至2024年9月的12個月內,FIGS的應計比率爲-0.33。因此,其法定每股收益遠低於其自由現金流。實際上,它在去年有5100萬美元的自由現金流,遠遠超過其1080萬美元的法定利潤。FIGS的自由現金流在過去一年實際上有所下降,這令人失望,就像不可生物降解的氣球一樣。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。
Our Take On FIGS' Profit Performance
我們對FIGS盈利表現的看法
As we discussed above, FIGS' accrual ratio indicates strong conversion of profit to free cash flow, which is a positive for the company. Based on this observation, we consider it possible that FIGS' statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! On the other hand, its EPS actually shrunk in the last twelve months. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. If you'd like to know more about FIGS as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. At Simply Wall St, we found 2 warning signs for FIGS and we think they deserve your attention.
正如我們上面討論的,FIGS的應計比率表明其盈利向自由現金流的強轉換,這對公司是個積極信號。基於這一觀察,我們認爲FIGS的法定利潤實際上低估了其盈利潛力!另一方面,其每股收益在過去十二個月中實際上縮水了。當然,在分析其盈利時,我們只是剛剛開始;我們還可以考慮利潤率、預測增長和投資回報等其他因素。如果您想了解更多關於FIGS的業務,了解其面臨的任何風險也很重要。在Simply Wall St,我們發現FIGS存在2個警示信號,我們認爲它們值得您關注。
This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of FIGS' profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.
此說明僅關注一個因素,闡明瞭FIGS盈利的性質。但還有很多其他方式可以幫助您了解一個公司。有些人認爲高股本回報率是優質業務的良好標誌。因此,您可能希望查看這份免費收集的高股本回報率公司,或這份高內部持股的股票名單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。