McKesson's (NYSE:MCK) Conservative Accounting Might Explain Soft Earnings
McKesson's (NYSE:MCK) Conservative Accounting Might Explain Soft Earnings
McKesson Corporation's (NYSE:MCK) recent soft profit numbers didn't appear to worry shareholders, as the stock price showed strength. We think that investors might be looking at some positive factors beyond the earnings numbers.
麥克森公司(紐交所:MCK)最近的盈利數據似乎沒有讓股東感到擔憂,因爲股票價格顯示出強勁的表現。我們認爲投資者可能在關注一些超出盈利數字的積極因素。
A Closer Look At McKesson's Earnings
仔細審視麥克森的盈利情況
Many investors haven't heard of the accrual ratio from cashflow, but it is actually a useful measure of how well a company's profit is backed up by free cash flow (FCF) during a given period. The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.
許多投資者沒有聽說過現金流量的計提比率,但它實際上是衡量一個公司在給定期間的自由現金流(FCF)支持其利潤能力的有用指標。計提比率從該期間的利潤中減去FCF,並將結果除以公司在該時間內的平均營運資產。該比率告訴我們一個公司的利潤超過了其自由現金流的多少。
That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth.
這意味着負應計比率是一件好事,因爲它表明公司帶來的自由現金流比其利潤所建議的要多。這並不意味着我們應該擔心正應計比率,但值得注意的是應計比率相當高的地方。這是因爲一些學術研究表明,高應計比率往往會導致利潤降低或利潤增長較少。
For the year to September 2024, McKesson had an accrual ratio of -1.99. That implies it has very good cash conversion, and that its earnings in the last year actually significantly understate its free cash flow. To wit, it produced free cash flow of US$4.3b during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of US$2.54b. Over the last year, McKesson's free cash flow remained steady. Having said that, there is more to the story. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.
截至2024年9月的財年,麥克森的應計比率爲-1.99。這意味着它的現金轉換非常好,並且它去年的盈利實際上顯著低於其自由現金流。具體來說,它在此期間產生了43億美金的自由現金流,遠超其報告的利潤25.4億美金。過去一年,麥克森的自由現金流保持穩定。不過,事情還有更多的故事。我們可以看到,飛凡項目影響了其法定利潤,因此也影響了應計比率。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。
How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?
非常規項目如何影響利潤?
McKesson's profit was reduced by unusual items worth US$805m in the last twelve months, and this helped it produce high cash conversion, as reflected by its unusual items. This is what you'd expect to see where a company has a non-cash charge reducing paper profits. It's never great to see unusual items costing the company profits, but on the upside, things might improve sooner rather than later. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And that's hardly a surprise given these line items are considered unusual. Assuming those unusual expenses don't come up again, we'd therefore expect McKesson to produce a higher profit next year, all else being equal.
麥克森的利潤因飛凡項目在過去十二個月中減少了80500萬美元,這幫助它實現了較高的現金轉換,正如其飛凡項目所反映的那樣。這是你會期望看到的,當一家公司有非現金費用降低了賬面利潤。看到飛凡項目使公司損失利潤從來都不是好事,但從積極的方面來看,情況可能會比預期改善得更快。當我們分析了全球絕大多數上市公司時,我們發現顯著的飛凡項目通常不會重複。這並不奇怪,因爲這些項目被視爲飛凡。假設那些飛凡費用不會再次出現,那麼我們預計麥克森明年的利潤會更高,其他條件保持不變。
Our Take On McKesson's Profit Performance
我們對麥克森盈利表現的看法
In conclusion, both McKesson's accrual ratio and its unusual items suggest that its statutory earnings are probably reasonably conservative. Based on these factors, we think McKesson's underlying earnings potential is as good as, or probably even better, than the statutory profit makes it seem! So while earnings quality is important, it's equally important to consider the risks facing McKesson at this point in time. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for McKesson you should know about.
總之,麥克森的應計比率和其飛凡項目表明,其法定收益可能相對保守。基於這些因素,我們認爲麥克森的潛在收益能力與法定利潤相比,差不多是一樣的,甚至可能更好!因此,雖然收益質量很重要,但在此時考慮麥克森面臨的風險同樣重要。每個公司都有風險,我們發現麥克森有兩個你應該知道的警告信號。
Our examination of McKesson has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And it has passed with flying colours. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.
我們對麥克森的檢查集中在一些因素上,這些因素可能使其收益看起來比實際更好。它取得了優異的成績。但如果你能夠專注於細節,總會有更多的發現。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利業務經濟的跡象,而其他人則喜歡「追蹤資金」,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。因此,你可能希望查看這個自由收集的高股本回報率公司,或者這個擁有高內部持股的股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。