share_log

We Think Atomera (NASDAQ:ATOM) Can Afford To Drive Business Growth

We Think Atomera (NASDAQ:ATOM) Can Afford To Drive Business Growth

我們認爲atomera(納斯達克:ATOM)能夠推動業務增長
Simply Wall St ·  11/14 20:01

Just because a business does not make any money, does not mean that the stock will go down. For example, although Amazon.com made losses for many years after listing, if you had bought and held the shares since 1999, you would have made a fortune. But the harsh reality is that very many loss making companies burn through all their cash and go bankrupt.

僅僅因爲一個企業沒有盈利,不代表股票會下跌。例如,亞馬遜在上市後多年虧損,但如果你從1999年開始買入並持有股票,你會賺得盆滿鉢滿。但殘酷的現實是,許多虧損的公司會迅速燒光所有現金並破產。

So should Atomera (NASDAQ:ATOM) shareholders be worried about its cash burn? In this report, we will consider the company's annual negative free cash flow, henceforth referring to it as the 'cash burn'. The first step is to compare its cash burn with its cash reserves, to give us its 'cash runway'.

那麼,atomera(納斯達克:ATOM)的股東應該擔心其現金消耗嗎?在本報告中,我們將考慮公司的年度負自由現金流,今後將其稱爲「現金消耗」。第一步是將其現金消耗與現金儲備進行比較,以便給我們提供其「現金跑道」。

When Might Atomera Run Out Of Money?

atomera什麼時候可能會耗盡資金?

You can calculate a company's cash runway by dividing the amount of cash it has by the rate at which it is spending that cash. In September 2024, Atomera had US$17m in cash, and was debt-free. Importantly, its cash burn was US$13m over the trailing twelve months. So it had a cash runway of approximately 16 months from September 2024. That's not too bad, but it's fair to say the end of the cash runway is in sight, unless cash burn reduces drastically. The image below shows how its cash balance has been changing over the last few years.

您可以通過將公司擁有的現金量除以其支出現金的速度來計算公司的現金跑道。到2024年9月,atomera擁有1700萬美金現金,並且沒有債務。重要的是,它的現金消耗在過去12個月中爲1300萬美金。因此,從2024年9月起,它的現金跑道大約爲16個月。這還不錯,但可以公平地說,現金跑道的盡頭在望,除非現金消耗大幅減少。下圖顯示了該公司現金餘額在過去幾年中的變化情況。

big
NasdaqCM:ATOM Debt to Equity History November 14th 2024
納斯達克CM:ATOM債務與股本歷史 2024年11月14日

How Is Atomera's Cash Burn Changing Over Time?

atomera的現金消耗是如何隨時間變化的?

In our view, Atomera doesn't yet produce significant amounts of operating revenue, since it reported just US$662k in the last twelve months. Therefore, for the purposes of this analysis we'll focus on how the cash burn is tracking. With cash burn dropping by 10% it seems management feel the company is spending enough to advance its business plans at an appropriate pace. Clearly, however, the crucial factor is whether the company will grow its business going forward. So you might want to take a peek at how much the company is expected to grow in the next few years.

在我們看來,atomera尚未產生顯著的營業收入,因爲它在過去12個月中僅報告了66.2萬美金。因此,出於本分析的目的,我們將專注於現金消耗的追蹤。現金消耗下降了10%,看來管理層認爲公司支出足夠,以適當的步伐推進其業務計劃。然而,關鍵因素顯然是公司未來是否會增長。因此,您可能想要看看公司在未來幾年中預計增長的幅度。

Can Atomera Raise More Cash Easily?

atomera能否更容易地籌集更多現金?

While Atomera is showing a solid reduction in its cash burn, it's still worth considering how easily it could raise more cash, even just to fuel faster growth. Issuing new shares, or taking on debt, are the most common ways for a listed company to raise more money for its business. Commonly, a business will sell new shares in itself to raise cash and drive growth. By looking at a company's cash burn relative to its market capitalisation, we gain insight on how much shareholders would be diluted if the company needed to raise enough cash to cover another year's cash burn.

雖然atomera在其現金消耗方面顯示出顯著的減小,但還是值得考慮它在多大程度上能夠更容易地籌集更多現金,即使只是爲了加速增長。發行新股或借款是上市公司爲其業務籌集更多資金的最常見方式。通常,一個企業會出售新股以籌集現金並推動增長。通過觀察公司的現金消耗與其市值的關係,我們能夠了解到,如果公司需要籌集足夠的現金來覆蓋另一年的現金消耗,股東將面臨多少稀釋。

Atomera's cash burn of US$13m is about 7.7% of its US$170m market capitalisation. That's a low proportion, so we figure the company would be able to raise more cash to fund growth, with a little dilution, or even to simply borrow some money.

atomera的現金消耗爲1300萬美元,大約佔其17000萬美元市值的7.7%。這是一個較低的比例,因此我們認爲公司能夠籌集更多現金以支持增長,儘管會有一些稀釋,或者甚至簡單地借一些錢。

Is Atomera's Cash Burn A Worry?

atomera的現金消耗是個問題嗎?

Atomera appears to be in pretty good health when it comes to its cash burn situation. One the one hand we have its solid cash runway, while on the other it can also boast very strong cash burn relative to its market cap. While we're the kind of investors who are always a bit concerned about the risks involved with cash burning companies, the metrics we have discussed in this article leave us relatively comfortable about Atomera's situation. Separately, we looked at different risks affecting the company and spotted 4 warning signs for Atomera (of which 1 is a bit concerning!) you should know about.

在現金消耗方面,atomera的健康狀況似乎相當不錯。一方面,我們有其穩定的現金供給,另一方面,它的現金消耗相對市值也非常強勁。雖然我們是那種始終對現金消耗型公司所涉及的風險略感擔憂的投資者,但我們在本文中討論的指標讓我們對atomera的情況感到相對舒適。另另一方面,我們查看了影響公司的不同風險,並發現了4個atomera的警告信號(其中1個稍顯令人擔憂!)您應該了解。

If you would prefer to check out another company with better fundamentals, then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt or this list of stocks which are all forecast to grow.

如果您希望查詢其他基本面更好的公司,則不要錯過具有高淨資產回報率和低債務的有趣公司免費列表,或者這個預計所有股票都會增長的股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論