Arcosa (NYSE:ACA) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
Arcosa (NYSE:ACA) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Arcosa, Inc. (NYSE:ACA) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
伯克希爾·哈撒韋的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李錄在談到投資風險時毫不掩飾地表示:「最大的投資風險不是價格波動,而是是否會遭受永久性資本損失。」 當我們考慮一家公司有多大風險時,我們總是喜歡看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過載可能導致滅頂之災。 我們注意到Arcosa公司(紐交所:ACA)的資產負債表上確實有債務。 但真正的問題是這筆債務是否讓公司變得風險更高。
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
當企業無法通過自由現金流或以優惠的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行債務或債務時,債務和其他負債就會對企業產生風險。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸方可以接管企業。然而,更頻繁(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,企業必須以低於市場價的價格發行股票,永久稀釋股東,以加強其資產負債表。當然,債務可以是企業重要的工具,特別是在資本密集的企業中。當我們檢查債務水平時,首先考慮現金和債務水平。
What Is Arcosa's Debt?
Arcosa的債務是什麼?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 Arcosa had US$1.23b of debt, an increase on US$495.4m, over one year. However, it also had US$756.8m in cash, and so its net debt is US$471.4m.
您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但數據顯示,截至2024年9月,Arcosa的債務爲12.3億美元,較去年增加了49540萬美元。然而,它也有75680萬美元的現金,因此淨債務爲47140萬美元。
How Strong Is Arcosa's Balance Sheet?
Arcosa的資產負債表有多強?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Arcosa had liabilities of US$432.3m due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.49b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$756.8m as well as receivables valued at US$396.4m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$769.6m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
最新的資產負債表數據顯示,Arcosa短期債務爲43230萬美元,長期債務爲14.9億美元。 抵消這些債務的是,它手頭現金爲75680萬美元,以及價值39640萬美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。 因此,其負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款的總和多了76960萬美元。
Since publicly traded Arcosa shares are worth a total of US$5.16b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.
由於上市的Arcosa股票總值爲51.6億美元,這種水平的負債似乎不太可能構成重大威脅。 但是有足夠的負債,我們肯定建議股東繼續關注資產負債表的情況。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
爲了衡量公司債務相對於其收入的規模,我們計算其淨債務除以利息、稅收、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),並計算其利息前稅利潤(EBIT)除以利息支出(其利息覆蓋率)。這樣,我們考慮了債務的絕對金額,以及支付的利率。
Looking at its net debt to EBITDA of 1.2 and interest cover of 5.9 times, it seems to us that Arcosa is probably using debt in a pretty reasonable way. But the interest payments are certainly sufficient to have us thinking about how affordable its debt is. It is well worth noting that Arcosa's EBIT shot up like bamboo after rain, gaining 34% in the last twelve months. That'll make it easier to manage its debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Arcosa's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
觀察其淨債務與EBITDA爲1.2倍,利息保障倍數爲5.9倍,我們認爲Arcosa可能在相當合理的範圍內使用債務。 但是利息支付肯定足以讓我們思考其負債的可承受能力。 值得一提的是,Arcosa的EBIT在過去12個月中迅速增長了34%。 這將使其更容易管理債務。 當分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要重點關注的領域。 但是最終決定Arcosa未來是否能保持健康資產負債表的,更多取決於未來的盈利。 如果您想了解專業人士的看法,可以查看關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, Arcosa produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 54% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.
最後,一個企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不能解決問題。 因此,我們總是檢查多少EBIT被轉化爲自由現金流。 在過去的三年中,Arcosa產生了可靠的自由現金流,相當於其EBIT的54%,符合我們的預期。 這筆冷硬現金意味着在需要時它可以減少債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Arcosa's EBIT growth rate suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. And we also thought its net debt to EBITDA was a positive. When we consider the range of factors above, it looks like Arcosa is pretty sensible with its use of debt. That means they are taking on a bit more risk, in the hope of boosting shareholder returns. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - Arcosa has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
Arcosa的EBIt增長率表明它可以像Cristiano Ronaldo在對陣14歲以下守門員時進球一樣輕鬆地處理債務。我們還認爲其淨債務與EBITDA之比是很正面的。考慮到以上因素的範圍時,Arcosa在債務使用上似乎非常明智。這意味着他們在希望提高股東回報的同時承擔了更多風險。當您分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要重點關注的領域。然而,並不是所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表內 - 遠非如此。例如 - Arcosa有1個警示標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
每天結束時,通常更好地關注那些沒有淨債務的公司。您可以查看我們特別名單上的這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。