Institutions Profited After Carter Bankshares, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CARE) Market Cap Rose US$57m Last Week but Individual Investors Profited the Most
Institutions Profited After Carter Bankshares, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CARE) Market Cap Rose US$57m Last Week but Individual Investors Profited the Most
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Carter Bankshares indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 40% ownership
- Institutional ownership in Carter Bankshares is 44%
- 卡特銀行股份的個人投資者擁有 considerable 的所有權,意味着他們共同在管理和業務策略上擁有更大的發言權
- 25家投資者持有公司的多數股權,佔有40%的所有權。
- 卡特銀行股份的機構投資比例爲 44%
A look at the shareholders of Carter Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:CARE) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 52% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看看卡特銀行股份有限公司(NASDAQ:CARE)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。擁有最大股份的群體是個人投資者,擁有 52% 的所有權。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲益最大(或者如果市場出現下行,則損失也最大)。
While individual investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$57m market cap gain, institutions too had a 44% share in those profits.
儘管個人投資者是上週5700萬美元市值增長中受益最多的一群,但機構也在這些利潤中佔有44%的份額。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Carter Bankshares.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關卡特銀行股的什麼信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Carter Bankshares?
機構所有權告訴我們有關卡特銀行股的什麼信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Carter Bankshares. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Carter Bankshares' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在卡特銀行股中擁有相當大的利益。 這表明在專業投資者中有一定的聲譽。 但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。 如果多家機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。 因此,值得查看下面的卡特銀行股票收益歷史。 當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Carter Bankshares is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 7.3%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.5% and 5.1% of the stock.
卡特爾銀行股份公司不由對沖基金持有。該公司最大的股東是黑石集團股份有限公司,擁有7.3%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.5%和5.1%的股票。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Carter Bankshares
卡特爾銀行股份公司的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Carter Bankshares, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$18m worth of the US$451m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有卡特爾銀行股份公司的一些股份。作爲個人,內部人員共同擁有價值1800萬美元的45100萬美元公司股份。這至少表明某種一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 52% of Carter Bankshares shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
普通大衆,主要是個人投資者,共同持有卡特爾銀行股份的52%。這種所有權水平使得來自更廣泛公衆的投資者具有影響關鍵政策決定的一定能力,例如董事會構成、高管薪酬以及股息支付比例。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Carter Bankshares that you should be aware of before investing here.
我覺得看清楚一個公司到底是誰擁有它非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了卡特銀行股份的1個警示標誌,你在投資之前應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。