Southside Bancshares, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SBSI) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 11% Over the Past Week
Southside Bancshares, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SBSI) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 11% Over the Past Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Southside Bancshares implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 48% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構在 Southside Bancshares 的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重要影響力。
- 共有25位投資者擁有這家公司48%的所有權。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
Every investor in Southside Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:SBSI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 55% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
Southside Bancshares 公司的每位投資者都應該注意最具影響力的股東團體。我們可以看到,機構持有該公司 55% 的股份。換句話說,該團體在投資該公司方面有最多的利潤(或損失).
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$110m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 38% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
道富銀行機構投資者的前景正在好轉,該公司上週市值增加了11000萬美元。股東的一年回報率目前爲38%,上週的增長堪稱錦上添花。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Southside Bancshares.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注southside bancshares的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Southside Bancshares?
機構持股告訴我們關於southside bancshares的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Southside Bancshares does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Southside Bancshares' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到southside bancshares確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股份的很大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看一下southside bancshares的下面所示的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Southside Bancshares. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 14%. With 6.6% and 4.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
投資者應該注意,實際上有超過一半的公司股份被機構持有,因此他們可以集體發揮重要影響力。在Southside Bancshares,對沖基金並沒有持有很多股份。該公司最大的股東是BlackRock, Inc.,持有14%的股份。第二和第三大股東分別是The Vanguard Group, Inc.持有6.6%的股份,State Street Global Advisors, Inc.持有4.2%的股份。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Southside Bancshares
Southside bancshares的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in Southside Bancshares, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$62m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以看到內部持有南邊銀行股份有限公司的股份。內部人士持有價值6200萬美元的有意義股份。大多數人會將其視爲真正的積極因素。如果您想探究內部人員關係問題,您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 39% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Southside Bancshares. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆擁有39%的股權,主要是個人投資者,對南邊銀行股份有限公司有一定程度的影響力。雖然這種所有權比例可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。