ZipRecruiter, Inc. (NYSE:ZIP) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 11% Loss Over the Past Year
ZipRecruiter, Inc. (NYSE:ZIP) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 11% Loss Over the Past Year
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies ZipRecruiter's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構擁有量顯著高,這意味着ZipRecruiter的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
- 總共有7位投資者擁有該公司的控制權,擁有53%的股份。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
If you want to know who really controls ZipRecruiter, Inc. (NYSE:ZIP), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 52% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道誰真正控制着ZipRecruiter,Inc.(紐交所:ZIP),那麼您將不得不看一下其股東註冊情況。持有最大股份的是機構,佔有52%。也就是說,如果股價上漲,這個群體將獲得最大利益(或者在股市下跌時損失最大)。
Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 14% increase in the share price after a year of 11% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.
機構投資者可能會歡迎上週股價上漲14%,這是一年來11%虧損之後,收益可能開始趨勢提高的跡象。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of ZipRecruiter.
在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於ZipRecruiter的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ZipRecruiter?
機構持股對我們揭示了關於ZipRecruiter的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in ZipRecruiter. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ZipRecruiter, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在ZipRecruiter中擁有相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,他們對其持有看好。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能出錯。如果兩位大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查ZipRecruiter的過去盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,也請記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ZipRecruiter. Our data shows that Siegel Family Trust is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 8.1%.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體擁有重要影響力。 我們注意到對於ZipRecruiter,對沖基金並沒有意義的投資。 我們的數據顯示,Siegel Family Trust是最大的股東,持有14%的流通股份。 第二和第三大股東分別是BlackRock,Inc.和The Vanguard Group,Inc.,他們都持有8.1%的股份。
We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前7名股東擁有超過一半的股份登記冊,還有一些小股東來平衡較大股東的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of ZipRecruiter
ZipRecruiter的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in ZipRecruiter, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$36m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以報告說,內部持有ZipRecruiter, Inc.的股份。這是一家大公司,因此看到這種程度的一致性是好的。內部人士持有價值3600萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部一致性問題,您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在購買或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in ZipRecruiter. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在ZipRecruiter持有23%的股份。雖然這個群體不能必然左右公司的決定,但肯定會對公司的運營產生實質影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 7.7% stake in ZipRecruiter. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
股權投資公司持有ZipRecruiter 7.7% 的股份。 這表明他們可能在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。 有時我們會看到股權投資公司長揸,但一般來說,他們投資時間較短,而且正如名稱所示,並不怎麼投資於公共公司。 一段時間後,他們可能會尋求出售並將資本重新配置到其他地方。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 14%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司14%的股份。私人公司可能是相關方。有時候內部人士通過持有私人公司而對公開公司產生興趣,而不是以個人身份擁有。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但這值得作爲進一步研究的一個方向。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with ZipRecruiter (at least 2 which are a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
雖然值得考慮持有公司的不同群體,但有其他更重要的因素。 比如,要考慮投資風險的不斷出現。 我們已經識別出ZipRecruiter的4個警示信號(至少有2個有點不愉快) ,了解它們應該成爲您的投資流程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。