Insiders Were the Biggest Winners as Golden Matrix Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:GMGI) Market Cap Grew by US$64m Last Week
Insiders Were the Biggest Winners as Golden Matrix Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:GMGI) Market Cap Grew by US$64m Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Golden Matrix Group's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- Aleksandar Milovanovic owns 59% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- Golden Matrix Group的持有重要內部股權意味着對公司擴張的固有利益
- Aleksandar Milovanovic擁有公司的59%
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:GMGI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 85% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制着Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (納斯達克:GMGI),了解業務的所有權結構至關重要。我們可以看到個人內部持有公司85%的所有權。換句話說,該團體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$64m last week.
顯然,在上週公司的市值上漲了6400萬美元后,內部人士受益最多。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Golden Matrix Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Golden Matrix Group的每一類所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Golden Matrix Group?
機構持股情況能告訴我們有關Golden Matrix Group的什麼信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Less than 5% of Golden Matrix Group is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.
Golden Matrix Group不到5%的股份由機構投資者持有。這表明一些基金正在關注該公司,但許多尚未購買其股票。如果公司正在增加收入,這可能表明它才剛開始引起這些資金雄厚的投資者的注意。如果多個機構投資者同時試圖買入股票,很常見看到股價大漲。因此,請查看下面的歷史收入軌跡,但請記住最重要的是未來。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Golden Matrix Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Aleksandar Milovanovic with 59% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 13% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.7% by the third-largest shareholder. Anthony Goodman, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
對於Golden Matrix Group,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是Aleksandar Milovanovic擁有59%的流通股。這意味着他們對公司未來具有絕對控制權。 第二大股東持有約13%的流通股,第三大股東持有6.7%的股份。第二大股東Anthony Goodman也恰好擔任首席執行官。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
南京證券複合材料公司內部所有權情況
Insider Ownership Of Golden Matrix Group
持股人是否有實際控制Golden Matrix Group,對於公司來說至關重要。雖然這個群體可能不能決定說了算,但肯定對公司的運營產生了真正的影響。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Golden Matrix Group, Inc. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of US$316m, that means they have US$267m worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
看起來,內部人士擁有Golden Matrix Group,Inc. 超過一半的股份。 這讓他們擁有很大的權力。 鑑於該公司市值31600萬美元,這意味着他們擁有26700萬美元的股份。 大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。 您可能希望免費發現他們是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Golden Matrix Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,通常是個體投資者,在Golden Matrix Group持有14%的股份。 儘管這個組織不能必然左右決策,但它確實可以對公司的運行產生實質影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Golden Matrix Group you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.
雖然考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。 例如:我們發現了Golden Matrix Group的3個警示信號,您應該注意,其中有1個有點令人擔憂。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。