share_log

Arrow Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:AROW) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 14% Over Last Week

Arrow Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:AROW) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 14% Over Last Week

箭牌金融公司(納斯達克股票代碼:AROW)的高機構持股量令人印象深刻,股價持續上漲,上週增長14%。
Simply Wall St ·  11/07 06:14

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Arrow Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 46% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 顯著較高的機構持股意味着箭牌金融的股價對它們的交易行爲非常敏感
  • 前 25 名股東擁有該公司的 46%。
  • 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。

If you want to know who really controls Arrow Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:AROW), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 49% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着Arrow Financial Corporation (納斯達克:AROW),那麼您需要查看其股東登記表的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的絕大部分股份,持股比例爲49%。也就是說,如果股價上漲(或者出現下跌),這一群體將獲得最大利益(或者損失最大)。

Last week's 14% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 50% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週的14%增長意味着機構投資者處於正面,即使公司展現出強勁的長期趨勢。 股東的一年回報目前爲50%,上週的增長是錦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Arrow Financial, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究箭牌金融的每一種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:AROW Ownership Breakdown November 7th 2024
納斯達克:AROW 2024年11月7日的所有權拆分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Arrow Financial?

機構持股告訴我們有關箭牌金融的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Arrow Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Arrow Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到箭牌金融確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司的股份。 這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。 但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。 如果多個機構同時改變他們對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。 因此,值得查看下面的箭牌金融的盈利歷史。 當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:AROW Earnings and Revenue Growth November 7th 2024
納斯達克GS:AROW第7,2024年增收增長

Arrow Financial is not owned by hedge funds. North Country Investment Advisers, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.7% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 5.0% of the company stock.

箭牌金融未被對沖基金擁有。 北國投資顧問公司目前是最大的股東,持有12%的流通股。 黑石集團擁有的普通股7.7%,範迪公司持有約5%的公司股票。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以了解風向正在往哪裏吹。雖然有一些分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍然會變得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of Arrow Financial

箭牌金融的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Arrow Financial Corporation. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$13m worth of the US$492m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

最新數據顯示,公司內部股東擁有 Arrow 金融公司的部分股份。作爲個人,這些內部人士共同擁有價值1300萬美元的49200萬美元公司。看到內部人士有一些投資是好事,但值得檢查這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 48% stake in Arrow Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在 Arrow 金融公司持有48%的股份。雖然這個群體不一定能左右局面,但肯定能對公司的運行產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論