share_log

Crane Company's (NYSE:CR) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 5.1% Over the Past Week

Crane Company's (NYSE:CR) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 5.1% Over the Past Week

大型機構投資者必定感到滿意,因爲這家紐交所公司(NYSE:CR)的股票繼續表現優異,過去一週上漲了5.1%。
Simply Wall St ·  11/06 03:04

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Crane's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構擁有的股份比例極高,意味着Crane的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 該公司共有8個股東擁有51%的股權。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

Every investor in Crane Company (NYSE:CR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 74% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

作爲Crane公司(紐交所: CR)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東團體。機構擁有公司中的最大份額,佔比74%。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該團體將獲益最多(或在股價下跌時損失最大)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$446m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 61% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週該公司市值增加了44600萬美元,機構投資者的前景看好。 股東的年度回報率目前爲61%,上週的盈利是錦上添花。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Crane.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對Crane能告訴我們什麼。

big
NYSE:CR Ownership Breakdown November 5th 2024
NYSE:CR 2024年11月5日歸屬權歸屬情況分析

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Crane?

機構持股告訴我們關於Crane的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Crane does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Crane, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Crane確實有機構投資者,並持有公司股票的一部分。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究了該股,並且喜歡它。 但和其他人一樣,他們也可能錯。 如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一支股票,則很常見看到股價大跌。 因此,值得檢查Crane的過去盈利軌跡(下文)。 當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:CR Earnings and Revenue Growth November 5th 2024
紐約證券交易所:CR 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年11月5日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Crane. The company's largest shareholder is The Crane Fund, Endowment Arm, with ownership of 14%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.2% and 7.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Max Mitchell is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會共同強烈影響董事會的決定。我們注意到,對Crane基金沒有實質性投資。該公司最大的股東是Crane基金,捐贈委員會,持有14%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的8.2%和7.5%。此外,首席執行官Max Mitchell擁有該公司股份的0.6%。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

內部人員擁有佛山藍火箭電子股份有限公司的重要比例。內部人員在這家69億元人民幣的企業中持有25億元人民幣的股份,看到內部人員如此投資是很好的。如果這些內部人員最近一直在購買,那就值得檢查。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Crane

Crane的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Crane Company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$82m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人員擁有Crane公司不到1%的股份。 由於公司規模較大,我們不會指望內部人員擁有大量股票。總共,他們擁有8200萬美元的股票。 看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但值得注意的是這些內部人員是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Crane. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Crane 11%的股份。 儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響政策決定的方向,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論