Private Equity Firms Among SkyWater Technology, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SKYT) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 11% Price Drop
Private Equity Firms Among SkyWater Technology, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SKYT) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 11% Price Drop
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by private equity firms in SkyWater Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 51% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- Insider ownership in SkyWater Technology is 25%
- 私募股權公司在SkyWater Technology擁有的相當大的所有權表明,他們在管理和業務策略上共同擁有更大的發言權。
- 前4大股東持有51%的業務股份
- SkyWater Technology的內部持股比例爲25%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of SkyWater Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:SKYT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 27% to be precise, is private equity firms. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着SkyWater Technology, Inc. (納斯達克:SKYT),重要的是要了解該企業的所有權結構。在公司中持有最多股份的群體,準確地說約佔27%,是私募股權公司。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的增長潛力(或下行風險)。
While the holdings of private equity firms took a hit after last week's 11% price drop, insiders with their 25% also suffered.
上週股權投資公司的持股在經歷11%的股價下跌後受到打擊,擁有25%股份的內部人員也遭受了損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of SkyWater Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究SkyWater Technology的每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SkyWater Technology?
機構持股告訴我們關於SkyWater Technology的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
SkyWater Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at SkyWater Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
SkyWater Technology已經有機構出現在股東註冊表上。確實,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者中有一定的信譽度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像所有人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變他們對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,看看SkyWater Technology的營業收入歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in SkyWater Technology. The company's largest shareholder is Oxbow Industries, LLC, with ownership of 27%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 9.1% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Thomas Sonderman is the owner of 0.9% of the company's shares.
對SkyWater Technology,對沖基金沒有持有太多股份。該公司最大的股東是Oxbow Industries,持有27%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約11%和9.1%的股份。此外,CEO Thomas Sonderman擁有公司股份的0.9%。
On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步觀察後,我們發現前4大股東擁有51%的股份。換句話說,這些股東對公司決策具有重要影響力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of SkyWater Technology
SkyWater Technology的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of SkyWater Technology, Inc.. Insiders have a US$118m stake in this US$465m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看來內部人擁有SkyWater Technology, Inc.的大部分股份。內部人在這家價值46500萬美元的公司中擁有11800萬美元的股份。看到內部人如此投資於該業務是非常好的。也許值得檢查一下這些內部人最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in SkyWater Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在SkyWater Technology中持有23%的股份。儘管擁有的股份很大,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能無法改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 27% stake in SkyWater Technology. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
股權投資公司持有SkyWater Technology 27%的股份。這意味着他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時候我們會看到股權投資公司長揸股份,但總的來說,他們的投資視野較短,就像名字所暗示的那樣,不太投資公共公司。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售股份,並將資本重新配置到其他地方。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand SkyWater Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - SkyWater Technology has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is concerning) we think you should know about.
值得考慮公司股東的不同群體。但要更好地了解SkyWater Technology,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們需要考慮風險- SkyWater Technology 有2個警示信號(其中1個令人擔憂),我們認爲您應該知曉。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。