Institutional Investors in First Busey Corporation (NASDAQ:BUSE) Lost 4.1% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth
Institutional Investors in First Busey Corporation (NASDAQ:BUSE) Lost 4.1% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, First Busey's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 23 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have been buying lately
- 鑑於機構對該股的大量持股,First Busey的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
- 前23個股東擁有公司50%的股份。
- 內部人員最近一直在買入。
Every investor in First Busey Corporation (NASDAQ:BUSE) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
First Busey Corporation(納斯達克:BUSE)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有公司58%的股權。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果出現市場下行,將承擔最大風險)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 4.1% last week. However, the 21% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
投資虧損是股東中沒人願意經歷的事情,尤其是機構投資者,他們上週看到自己持有的價值下降了4.1%。然而,股東的一年回報率爲21%,可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但他們可能會對未來的損失保持謹慎。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of First Busey, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究First Busey的每一類股東,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About First Busey?
機構持股告訴我們關於First Busey的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
First Busey already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see First Busey's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
First Busey已經有機構在股權登記簿上。實際上,他們在公司擁有相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票並且喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在它們處於『擁擠交易』中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以查看First Busey的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in First Busey. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 8.3% of shares outstanding. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is the second largest shareholder owning 5.8% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 5.3% of the company stock.
投資者應該注意,機構實際擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們集體可以行使重大權力。我們注意到對First Busey沒有任何實質性的投資。BlackRock, Inc.目前是最大的股東,持有8.3%的流通股份。Dimensional Fund Advisors LP是第二大股東,擁有5.8%的普通股,The Vanguard Group, Inc.持有約5.3%的公司股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 23 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
Sea股票內部持有情況 我們最新的數據表明,內部持有相當比例的Sea Limited的股份。內部人士持有價值65億美元的這家價值430億美元的公司。這是相當有意義的。大多數人會高興地看到董事會正在與他們一起投資。您可能希望訪問此處的免費圖表,以顯示內部人員的最近交易情況。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of First Busey
first busey的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in First Busey Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$86m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以報告,內部人員確實持有First Busey Corporation的股份。這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性是件好事。內部人員持有價值8600萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會認爲這顯示了股東和董事會之間利益的一致性。儘管如此,檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在賣出股份可能是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 36% stake in First Busey. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在First Busey擁有36%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以左右其利益,但他們仍然可以集體對公司政策產生影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for First Busey that you should be aware of.
我發現看看公司究竟由誰擁有非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經發現第一巴西存在1個警示信號,您應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。